User talk:Clearbluepr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, concerning your contribution, Towing Safety, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from www.masterlock.com/automotive/pdf/Towing_Troubles_2006_B.pdf. As a copyright violation, Towing Safety appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Towing Safety has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Towing Safety. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Towing Safety, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Slp1 20:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

  1. Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
  2. Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --Slp1 21:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I left a message for you on Talk:Towing Safety --Slp1 21:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Towing Safety Article

Hi, It looks like they deleted Towing Safety which is too bad since I thought we were starting to get somewhere. Anyway, I have managed to save the talk page so that you can try to get the necessary permissions before you try again!!! Or, like I say below, you could also rewrite in your own words which would avoid all this permission problem!!! --Slp1 04:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Copied from Talk:Towing Safety

This information was released in a national press release by Master Lock (and their PR agency ClearBlue)as part of their initiative to provide information and educate consumers on the importance of towing safely. Materials provided in the press release and then published on this website are allowed to be reprinted and published for educational uses. Clearbluepr 21:22, 18 December 2006 (UTC)ClearBluePR


Hi, I have replaced the speedy tag and fixed up your hangon tag so that it will work effectively. Can I suggest that you review this [[1]] for more information about the copyright rules here at wikipedia. I believe it is possible for MasterLock to give some sort of appropriate permission for its use, but I know it is not straightforward and the education use permission are not accepted by Wikipedia. I am not an expert at this but could try to help you if you want. In any case, I don't think the MasterLock part would be able to stay, since it is really an ad, and that is not really suitable in an encyclopedia. Good luck and let me know if I can help --Slp1 21:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

There is more specific information about what you have to do at [2], in case it helps! --Slp1 21:44, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. I am new to posting on this site, but I do have a couple of questions: 1. If the Master Lock part at the bottom is removed, can the rest of the piece stay? 2. How do I prove that I have permission from the company to post this information? I would like to include Master Lock as the source of this study, but understand if they cannot be used throughout the entire document. 3. I am including the actual link [3]to the press release where this information was taken from. My goal is to elaborate on the issue of towing safety, and believe that this press release is a good start. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.236.151.243 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 19 December 2006


Hi again, For your questions...

  • Question 1. I think it will help the article stay (and make the posting look more appropriate) if you remove the Master Lock parts, but in any case the thing about Wikipedia is that anybody can edit whatever you post here, so somebody will likely delete it whether you do or not!! The same goes with the rest of the article. You have to be prepared for the fact that others will alter it significantly, add things, delete things etc ad infinitum. But the big problem at the moment is that it is a word for word copy of a copyrighted work, and WP can't accept it without permission, which leads me to...
  • Question 2. Here is what I found at [4] about how you can prove that you have permission:

"Copyright owners who submitted their own work to Wikipedia: If you submitted work to Wikipedia which you had previously published (especially online), and your submission was marked as a potential infringement of copyright, stating that you are the copyright holder of the work on the article's talk page helps, but will not likely prevent deletion. It is sufficient to either:

  • Make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en at wikimedia dot org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation."

If you look at the link where I got this from then there are links to how to do each of these things. It will be important to do this, because I checked the Master Lock website and the legal notices there are actually very strict (including nothing to be added, deleted, etc) which would make keeping the article here impossible without consent. It doesn't matter that it was a press release, unfortunately.

  • Question 3. If your goal is to inform people about towing safety then the simplest thing might be to rewrite the press release information in your own words. Then no consent would be required!!!

Good luck, and let me know if I can help anymore. --Slp1 03:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


Thank you for your help! It sounds like rewriting the information and removing the Master Lock brand from the text is probably the best and easiest way to go. I will definitely look into the otherthings you mentioned too, though because it would be nice to use some of the information that we have already written.

Thanks!

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Towing.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Towing.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:34, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:MasterLocklogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MasterLocklogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:ClearBlue.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:ClearBlue.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:CBdetroit.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CBdetroit.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:NightWatch.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:NightWatch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 16:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:CBlogo.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:CBlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:47, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CBlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CBlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)