Talk:Clesh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion in the past. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must be listed in wikipedia as it was mentioned for months already in the article list of video editing software --Alcid (talk) 18:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- As with any article it's best to establish notability, preferably with an outside reference.Rob Banzai (talk) 19:15, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] notability
Added three notable references to keep this article --Alcid (talk) 19:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] this article should be kept
Clesh is notable as it was the first fully interactive consumer web-based editing package ever
--Alcid (talk) 12:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'm mostly a wikipedia inclussionist, meaning I tend to lean to the side of keeping articles rather than deleting them, and most importantly not just deleting articles if they can be salvaged! I'm not saying that that is what's happening here, but it happens darn often, where this article may well be notable, there may be quite a few references out there, it may well meet the notability guidelines of its category (if applicable), or its unverified claims may have some sources out there -- but because nobody takes the time to fetch such information (especially deletionist admins who often have the tools, knowledge, ability and resources to find such information - but would far prefer to have less articles on Wikipedia). The bottom line is this: go out there, find the references. If it was on TV program or radio program - there's citation templates for those. Mentioned in a magazine or newspaper? There's templates. Published in a book? Template! And of course, published in the news somewhere on the net - find it! Take the time, or admit that the article simply doesn't meet notability yet. Rfwoolf (talk) 16:24, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
