Talk:Cleavage enhancement
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] LGBT rating
I was unsure whether to rate this as "Start" or "B" - feel free to upgrade if you think it deserves it. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 15:55, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- I was likewise unsure. That's why I didn't rate it when I created it. :) --AliceJMarkham 16:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Did you know
I have suggested this article be featured in the did you know section of the mainpage here (fixed). Atropos 20:38, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- The correct link is T:TDYK, not TT:DYK, which goes off to a foreign language disambiguation page. Thanks for nominating it including a photo. I might get my picture on the front page of wikipedia. :) --AliceJMarkham 00:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Sources are hardly reliable, mostly personal websites and advertising.--Carabinieri 03:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- I think I'll go hide in a corner and cry now.--AliceJMarkham 05:41, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] POV
Current article is point of view of a crossdresser. This should be mentioned first or article should be changed to make it enhancement for all. Also if article is not changed to avoid pov, then all the links posted in see also should have description saying that it is for a crossdresser. Thanks. Lara_bran 04:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- I see no POV violation here. The article addresses cleavage enhancement for both men and women, and cites examples of both. Lara_bran, you seem to be on a stalking/harassment campaign against the creator of this article, and I would suggest you cool it before you get blocked/banned. Jeffpw 08:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. Cyberstalking of any form is frowned upon and stalking on wikipedia strictly prohibited. Benjiboi 08:29, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
-
- Please assume good faith, i came here by see also's i found everywhere. Also google search for "cleavage enhancement" shows this article first, so it should be neutral point of view. The article gives undue weightage to crossdresser. Also give a look at policy about canvassing. Thanks. Lara_bran 09:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Lara_bran, I'll assume good faith when you stop following Alice and harassing her on her talk page. Deal? Until such time, I'll keep an eye on what you're up to, in order to make sure Alice can edit without interference. Jeffpw 10:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Google's search places wikipedia amongst the first in many searches so that's a handy excuse but no reason to follow up with activities that quite a few folks see as cyberstalking. To answer the assertion that The article gives undue weightage to crossdresser I heartily disagree. It's a short article that clearly is about the subject and devotes all of one paragraph to crossdresser's to correctly illustrate that men do cleavage enhancement as well as women and spells out why. Benjiboi 17:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Please assume good faith, i came here by see also's i found everywhere. Also google search for "cleavage enhancement" shows this article first, so it should be neutral point of view. The article gives undue weightage to crossdresser. Also give a look at policy about canvassing. Thanks. Lara_bran 09:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)