User talk:Cladestine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Detroit Tigers logo
Hi there! Welcome to Wikipedia! I am really glad you are here, my name is wpktsfs. I just wanted to let you know of a little problem. The picture you are using in your userbox about you liking the Tigers (best team ever) is copyrighted and can not/should not be used in userspace. When it is used in userspace, outside of an article, it is copyright infringement. Please contact me on my talk page if you have any questions at all. Good luck at here at Wikipedia! --wpktsfs 01:40, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you! -wpktsfs 19:42, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WP:CVU status
The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:21, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Gail Kimbell
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gail Kimbell, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.foresthistory.org/research/usfscoll/people/Kimbell/Kimbell.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 17:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] I've tagged Gail Kimbell for speedy deletion
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Gail Kimbell article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. Katr67 22:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Re: Public domain status of USFS site. I think you are right (see:Wikipedia:Public domain#U.S. government works), but please check with the deleting admin, since s/he's the one who agreed with my speedy tag and ostensibly knows the copyright policy better than I do. If there was a copyright disclaimer on the article, I missed it, but if there wasn't, something like that should be put in the references section. See {{DANFS}} and {{1911}} for examples. I'd say go ahead and ask the deleting admin to restore the article, but honestly, I think it's a lot better for the project to just rewrite the material in your own words, using more than one source, even if the article starts out just being a stub. Thanks for contacting me. Katr67 23:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
