Classifying space for U(n)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In mathematics, the classifying space for U(n) may be constructed as either
- the Grassmannian of n-planes in an infinite-dimensional complex Hilbert space; or,
- the direct limit, with the induced topology, of Grassmannians of n planes.
Both constructions are detailed here.
Contents |
[edit] Construction 1
The total space EU(n) of the universal bundle is given by
Here, H is an infinite-dimensional complex Hilbert space, the ei are vectors in H, and δij is the Kronecker delta. The symbol is the inner product on H. Thus, we have that EU(n) is the space of orthonormal n-frames in H.
The group action of U(n) on this space is the natural one. The base space is then
- BU(n) = EU(n) / U(n)
and is the set of Grassmannian n-dimensional subspaces (or n-planes) in H. That is,
so that V is an n-dimensional vector space.
[edit] Construction 2
Let be the space of orthonormal families of n vectors in and let be the Grassmannian of n-dimensional subvector spaces of . The total space of the universal bundle can be taken to be the direct limit of the as k goes to infinity, while the base space is the direct limit of the as k goes to infinity.
[edit] Validity of the second construction
In this section, we will define the topology on EU(n) and prove that EU(n) is indeed contractible.
Let be the space of orthonormal families of n vectors in . The group U(n) acts freely on and the quotient is the Grassmannian of n-dimensional subvector spaces of . The map
is a fibre bundle of fibre . Thus because πp(S2k − 1) is trivial and because of the long exact sequence of the fibration, we have
whenever . By taking k big enough, precisely for , we can repeat the process and get
This last group is trivial for k > n + p. Let
be the direct limit of all the (with the induced topology). Let
be the direct limit of all the (with the induced topology).
Lemma
The group πp(EU(n)) is trivial for all .
Proof Let γ be a map from the sphere Sp to EU(n). As Sp is compact, there exists k such that γ(Sp) is included in . By taking k big enough, we see that γ is homotopic, with respect to the base point, to the constant map.
In addition, U(n) acts freely on EU(n). The spaces and are CW-complexes. One can find a decomposition of these spaces into CW-complexes such that the decomposition of , resp. , is induced by restriction of the one for , resp. . Thus EU(n) (and also ) is a CW-complex. By Whitehead Theorem and the above Lemma, EU(n) is contractible.
[edit] Case of n = 1 (first construction)
In the case of n = 1, one has
which is a contractible space (see Contractibility of unit sphere in Hilbert space.)
The base space is then
the infinite-dimensional complex projective space. Thus, the set of isomorphism classes of circle bundles over a manifold M are in one-to-one correspondence with the homotopy classes of maps from M to .
One also has the relation that
that is, BU(1) is the infinite-dimensional projective unitary group. See that article for additional discussion and properties.
For a torus T, which is abstractly isomorphic to , but need not have a chosen identification, one writes BT.
The topological K-theory K0(BT) is given by numerical polynomials; more details below.
[edit] Cohomology of BU(n)
Proposition
The cohomology of the classifying space H * (BU(n)) is a ring of polynomials in n variables where cp is of degree 2p.
Proof Let us first consider the case n = 1. In this case, U(1) is the circle S1 and the universal bundle is . It is well known[1] that the cohomology of is isomorphic to , where c1 is the Euler class of the U(1)-bundle , and that the injections , for , are compatible with these presentations of the cohomology of the projective spaces. This proves the Proposition for n = 1.
In the general case, let T be the subgroup of diagonal matrices. It is a maximal torus in U(n). Its classifying space is and its cohomology is , where xi is the Euler class of the tautological bundle over the i-th . The Weyl group acts on T by permuting the diagonal entries, hence it acts on by permutation of the factors. The induced action on its cohomology is the permutation of the xi's. We deduce
where the ci's are the symmetric polynomials in the xi's.
[edit] K-theory of BU(n)
The topological K-theory is known explicitly in terms of numerical symmetric polynomials.
The K-theory reduces to computing K0, since K-theory is 2-periodic and BU(n) is a limit of complex manifolds, so it has a CW-structure with only cells in even dimensions, so odd K-theory vanishes.
Thus , where , where t is the Bott generator.
K0(BU(1)) is the ring of numerical polynomials in w, regarded as a subring of , where w is element dual to tautological bundle.
For the n-torus, K0(BTn) is numerical polynomials in n variables. The map is onto, via a splitting principle, as Tn is the maximal torus of U(n). The map is the symmetrization map
and the image can be identified as the symmetric polynomials satisfying the integrality condition that
where
is the multinomial coefficient and contains r distinct integers, repeated times, respectively.
[edit] References
S. Ochanine, L. Schwartz (1985), “Une remarque sur les générateurs du cobordisme complex”, Math. Z. 190: 543–557 Contains a description of K0(BG) as a K0(K)-comodule for any compact, connected Lie group.
L. Schwartz (1983), K-théorie et homotopie stable, Université de Paris–VII Explicit description of K0(BU(n))
A. Baker, F. Clarke, N. Ray, L. Schwartz (1989), “On the Kummer congruences and the stable homotopy of BU”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 316 (2): 385–432, <http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9947%28198912%29316%3A2%3C385%3AOTKCAT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-F>
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- ^ R. Bott, L. W. Tu -- Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 82, Springer