User talk:Cjosefy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Updates to Baylor University article

I have been working on a number of articles and items related to Baylor University including the main Baylor University article. Also, I am still learning proper etiquette and culture here on wiki. Several days ago I edited in two places in the article the total number of staff, faculty, and students. I think you changed those numbers back to what they had been previously. I would like for us to arrive at the best way to get these numbers updated.

804 is the faculty number cited in several university reference documents, but those documents make clear that this number is for AAUP defined faculty and does not include library faculty. I included a reference to the 2006 Fall Facts [1] which shows that there are 31 additional faculty members from the library bringing the total faculty count to 835. The later referenced document in the article under reports total faculty and that is explained in the document. The same report that I cite above provides a ocunt of total staff at the university.

The student enrollment data that is now reported in the article is from the Fall 2006 enrollment information. New reports showing Spring 2007 enrollment figures have been released. I may well have cited the wrong report and numbers in my update. That doesn't really matter to me now. I just want to get the right info out there. This is the Spring 2007 enrollment report [2]. Is it most common to report total headcount on enrollment or total FTE?

I believe that it would be more accurate to reflect the numbers from the reports that I mention above within the article. I am looking for guidance and a way for us to avoid bouncing back and forth between the new and old numbers. Please excuse any malaprops that I may have made in this communication. As I said above, I am new to the environment and culture and appreciate any guidance. Thanks --RKWoodruff 02:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] STS-115

Thanks for pointing out my (rather large) mistake. :) Palebluedots 20:35, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Smashing Pumpkins

I would just like to say nice job on the SP page. Thanks alot for uploading those promo photos too, thats awesome. I think now we have enough images to completely rid of the album covers, especially since I completed the Post break-up project I had. -- Reaper X 03:10, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes, thats awesome. Could you please upload the photo from Machina/Machines of God (promo) too? -- Janadore 19:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Space Shuttle Atlantis

Hi, thanks for undoing Rebecca's revert of my date edit at Space Shuttle Atlantis. You may be aware of this, but she has promised several different editors that she will revert each such edits. If you look at her contributions, you will see that she has used the admin rollback tool to do exactly that.

Several editors are also complaining to her about incivility. See her talk page, and comments she has made elsewhere. Regards. bobblewik 18:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Tucson Toros memorabilia

Hi, and thanks for stopping by my Talk page. I'm not aware of our having any Eusebio equipment, although there may be a cracked bat in there with his name on it. We bought a helmet and a few other things at the time of the name change, but I don't have rosters from 1993 and earlier for looking up numbers, so in some cases we never know whose stuff it was. I did have an Orlando Miller Javalinas jacket, but to my lasting distress I lost it somewhere about five years ago. A least one of the Jerseys is Chris Hatcher, but I don't really remember, if I ever knew, who else is represented. We started going to Toros games around July 1993, so we didn't have all that much chance to see Eusebio before he was promoted to Houston. Regards. Karen | Talk | contribs 19:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bill Murray

Hi, can you upload the pics to commons, so that i can put it in ther others wikipedias?--Domingo Portales 20:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re: Mayonaise -> Mayonnaise

The Smashing Pumpkins song is intentionally spelled as "Mayonaise" as opposed to Mayonnaise. I noticed this was changed on The Smashing Pumpkins discography. I'm not sure it it was changed on any other pages. Cjosefy 14:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for that. I've added that article to my exception list. Cheers, CmdrObot 15:36, 11 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AnEveningWithJohnDenver.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AnEveningWithJohnDenver.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FarewellAndromeda.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FarewellAndromeda.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:The Metro Chicago.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:The Metro Chicago.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [3], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 23:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Wrigley Field Sign.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Wrigley Field Sign.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [4], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 00:32, 2 May 2008 (UTC)