Talk:City of Bones (Cassandra Clare novel)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to children's and young adult literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 22 August 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 11 January 2008. The result of the discussion was withdrawn.

[edit] Note

This article has major problems. If it isn't cleaned up soon it should be renominated on AFD. --Coredesat 05:29, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] New York Times best seller

City of Bones was ranked 78th in the Chapter Books section on April 7, 2007 New York Times, Children’s Books, published 22 April 2007. Catchpole (talk) 11:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

The nytimes.com site may say that (or it may say 8th, like the article claims), but the link requires registration and is thus generally inaccessible and should not be used per Wikipedia:External links#Sites requiring registration. Please don't edit war; your time would be better spent finding a better link. --Jack Merridew 12:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Jack, look at the guideline your invoking - it's about External links. It even says on the guideline page, "The subject of this guideline is external links that are not citations of article sources." So the basic premise of your objection doesn't even get out the gate. (And I can personally confirm the info in the article, because for some odd reason I was able to view the actual NYT article when I placed it, as you can see from this diff.) Pairadox (talk) 12:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Point taken; I've not removed it again. --Jack Merridew 15:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] External links

The following links were just removed from the article:

I would urge them to be restored as common sense tells me they are relevant to the article. Catchpole (talk) 15:11, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

see WP:EL#Advertising and conflicts of interest. --Jack Merridew 15:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
I originally placed them there as reference materials for the rewrite, not really intending they stay there permanently. As long as they're here for access, that should be fine. They do have access to info that could be integrated into the article. Pairadox (talk) 15:21, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
nb: I didn't remove them. --Jack Merridew 15:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
I saw that Jack. It's really my fault for not putting them here on the talk page in the first place like I thought about. I just didn't want them to get overlooked and didn't expect this to heat up so fast. I thought they'd be "safe" there for a while. Pairadox (talk) 15:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)