Talk:CityRail T & G sets

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale within the Trains WikiProject.

Portal	CityRail T & G sets is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Organisation of CityRail rollingstock articles

Shouldn't there be a common summary article about CityRail sets, and all existing pages named in a standard fashion e.g. by their letter codes or names e.g. V-Set (CityRail) (or DDIU (CityRail)), T-Set (CityRail) (or Tangara (CityRail), Endeavour (CityRail) etc? The current array is pretty messy and there is no table to link them all together as per the CityTrain, Connex Melbourne and other Australian systems. SM247 20:28, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Merge. Good idea. (JROBBO 10:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC))

Common summary article: sure. But I don't believe there's need to merge them. Dysprosia 10:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry Dysprosia, I actually agreed on a merge for some articles for some notable CityRail cars into one set... the text must have copied over to this article. I don't think a merge is a good idea for this article. (JROBBO 12:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC))

[edit] Car details

May I suggest that we do not need a complete listing of operational T sets in this article, as it is very technical and only likely to be of relevance to hardcore gunzels who can find this information more accurately elsewhere? Jammo (SM247) 04:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Used shit and condoms

why was the fact that the newer t-sets smell like shit and used condoms excluded from the article? this is a fact i, as a frequent train user, can attest to. i feel it needs to be included again.

Because you need to provide a source for that "fact". See Wikipedia:Verifiability. Harryboyles 11:54, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

stupid no original research crap... go on... catch a t-set... then you'll know. they have inane graffiti as well. every single one.