Talk:Citadel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

The IMAP article links to this page, but obviously meant one of the software entries for Citadel. I would guess Citadel/UX but that page is marked for deletion. So how should the IMAP page be corrected? --JamesStansell

Find sources: Citadel — news, books, scholar

[edit] Request to reader

Please, add more famous citadel on the list. vkvora 02:59, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dumb picture

I don't think a lord of the rings picture is nesseracary, thanks --Gerrado 16:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

--The lord of the rings picture could be a very useful way to put the article in perspective for some readers. The is no reason why the picture should not be there, as a citadel is not limited to reality, and in fact many of the most well known citadels hold a fictional connotation. So please try to objective and think before you edit; and lets try not to call stuff 'dumb' it is very informal for wiki standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.160.35.227 (talk) 22:08, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

He does have a point there 71.238.209.196 (talk) 01:36, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Limited scope

The scope of the article is too limited. Someone inserted a link to this article in the article on King George V class battleships and I followed it here. A citadel on a battleship is obviously somewhat different from the citadels described in this article, although one can only guess at the exact meaning of the word in the context of battleships. It must refer to an especially well armoured location on the ship, but what was it precisely? The bridge? The operations control center below the waterline? Time for someone with some specialised knowledge to step in. --Recoloniser 14:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

--The answers to your questions are in the disambiguation, and I believe that the problem of the limited scope, has been solved by the disclamer at the top of the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.160.35.227 (talk) 22:12, 24 November 2007 (UTC)