City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
City of Indianapolis v. Edmond | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||||
Argued October 3, 2000 Decided November 28, 2000 |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Holding | ||||||||||||
Police may not conduct roadblocks "whose primary purpose is to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing." Such roadblocks must have a specific primary purpose, such as keeping roadways safe from impaired drivers, or enforcing border security. | ||||||||||||
Court membership | ||||||||||||
Chief Justice: William Rehnquist Associate Justices: John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer |
||||||||||||
Case opinions | ||||||||||||
Majority by: O'Connor Joined by: Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer Dissent by: Rehnquist Joined by: Thomas; Scalia (only as to Part I) Dissent by: Thomas |
||||||||||||
Laws applied | ||||||||||||
U.S. Const. |
City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000) , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States limited the power of law enforcement to conduct suspicionless searches, specifically, using drug-sniffing dogs at roadblocks. Previous Supreme Court decisions had given the police power to create roadblocks for the purposes of border security (United States v. Martinez-Fuerte), and removing drunk drivers from the road (Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz). This decision stated that the power was limited to situations in which the search was "designed to serve special needs, beyond the normal need for law enforcement."
The opinion was delivered by Justice O'Connor, joined by Justices Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer.
Chief Justice Rehnquist delivered a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Thomas joined, and Justice Scalia joined as to part I.
Justice Thomas also filed a separate dissent.