City of Durham (UK Parliament constituency)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
City of Durham County constituency |
|
---|---|
City of Durham shown within County Durham, and County Durham shown within England | |
Created: | 1678 |
MP: | Roberta Blackman-Woods |
Party: | Labour |
Type: | House of Commons |
County: | County Durham |
EP constituency: | North East England |
City of Durham is a constituency represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It elects one Member of Parliament (MP) by the first past the post system of election. It has elected Labour MPs since 1935, although there have been strong Liberal-SDP Alliance and Liberal Democrat challenges to Labour since the 1980s.
Contents |
[edit] History
[edit] The parliamentary borough (1678-1918)
The City of Durham was first given the right to return Members to Parliament by an Act of Parliament in 1678, the last new borough but one to be enfranchised before the Great Reform Act of 1832. It was the only borough in County Durham, the county also having been unrepresented until the same Act of Parliament, which created two MPs for the county and two for the city. Both constituencies were frequently referred to simply as Durham, which can make for some confusion.
The constituency as constituted in 1678 consisted only of the city of Durham itself, though this included its suburbs which were within the municipal boundary. The right to vote was held by the corporation and the freemen of the city, many of whom were not resident within the boundaries. Unlike the situation in many small rotten boroughs, the corporation had no jurisdiction over the creation of freemen: freemen were generally created by connection with companies of trade, either by apprenticeship or by birth (by being the son of an existing freeman), though the common council of the city had a power to create honorary freemen.
The creation of honorary freemen with the specific intention of swaying elections was a common abuse in a number of boroughs in the 18th century, and at the Durham election of 1762 became sufficiently controversial to force a change in the law. The election was disputed because 215 new freemen, most of them not resident in the city, had been made after the writ for the election was issued. The existing freemen petitioned against this dilution of their voting rights, the candidate who had been declared elected was unseated by the Commons committee which heard the case, and the following year an Act of Parliament was passed to prevent any honorary freeman from voting in a borough election within twelve months of their being accorded that status.
Through having a freeman franchise the electorate was comparatively numerous for the period, though comprising only a small fraction of the city's population; at the time of the Reform Act there were between 1,100 and 1,200 freemen in total, of whom 427 were resident and 558 lived within seven miles, while the total population of the borough was 9,269. The Lambton and Tempest families were influential, and were generally able to secure election, but fell far short of the sort of control common in pocket boroughs.
The city retained both its MPs under the 1832 Reform Act, with its boundaries adjusted only very slightly, although as elsewhere the franchise was reformed. In 1867 the boundaries were extended to include part of Framwellgate parish which had previously been excluded. From 1885 the borough's representation was reduced to a single MP. In the boundary changes of 1918, the borough was abolished, but a division of County Durham was named after the City.
[edit] County constituency (since 1918)
From 1918, Durham City was included in a county constituency officially called The Durham Division of (County) Durham, consisting of the central part of the county. Until 1974 it included the town of Hetton-le-Hole and between 1950 and 1974 that of Spennymoor, as well as the rural districts in between, in which coal mining was the principal industry. The Durham county constituency from 1974 to 1983 included Durham itself, the Durham Rural District except Brancepeth and Sedgefield Rural District. In the 1983 boundary changes the constituency officially acquired the unambiguous City of Durham name for the first time, and its boundaries were realigned to match the new City of Durham local government district.
[edit] Current Boundaries
The constituency corresponds to the City of Durham local government district and as such includes a number of surrounding villages and suburbs as well as Durham itself, the largest of these are Brandon, Coxhoe, Bowburn, Framwellgate Moor, Sherburn and Ushaw Moor. The constituency expands as far west as Waterhouses and as far east as Ludworth. The seat has traditionally been dominated by Labour, with support particularly strong in those villages historically connected to County Durham's mining industry. Durham is famous as an educational centre, for Durham University and the feepaying preparatory school, Chorister School where Tony Blair was educated. The city centre is more inclined to the Liberal Democrats. Like many other university cities such as Cambridge and Oxford, in the 2005 election it swung strongly towards the Liberal Democrats, one possible reason being these cities' sizeable student population who were viewed as being hostile to Labour's policies on areas such as top-up fees and the Iraq War. The Liberal Democrats were able to reduce Labour's majority by over 10,000 votes, although they were still unable to gain the seat from Labour.
Following a review of parliamentary representation in County Durham, the Boundary Commission for England has made no changes to the City of Durham constituency, which will remain co-terminous with the boundaries of the district. However as a result of local government reform it is possible that the district council will have been abolished by the time of the next general election.
[edit] Members of Parliament
[edit] Durham City (borough)
- Constituency created (1678)
[edit] 1678-1885
Year | First member | First party | Second member | Second party | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1678 | Sir Ralph Cole | John Parkhurst | ||||
February 1679 | William Tempest | |||||
September 1679 | William Blakiston | Sir Richard Lloyd | ||||
1681 | William Tempest | |||||
1685 | Charles Montagu | |||||
1689 | George Morland | Henry Liddell | ||||
1690 | William Tempest | |||||
1695 | Charles Montagu | Henry Liddell | ||||
1698 | Thomas Conyers | |||||
1701 | Sir Henry Belasyse | |||||
1702 | Thomas Conyers | |||||
1708 | James Nicolson | |||||
1710 | Sir Henry Belasyse | |||||
1712 | Robert Shafto | |||||
1713 | George Baker | |||||
1722 | Charles Talbot | |||||
1727 | Robert Shafto | |||||
1730 | John Shafto | |||||
1734 | Henry Lambton | |||||
1742 | John Tempest | |||||
1761 | Ralph Gowland [1] | |||||
1762 | Major General John Lambton | |||||
1768 | John Tempest | Tory | ||||
1787 | William Henry Lambton | Whig | ||||
1794 | Sir Henry Vane-Tempest | Tory | ||||
1798 | Ralph John Lambton | Whig | ||||
1800 | Michael Angelo Taylor | Whig | ||||
1802 | Richard Wharton [2] | Tory | ||||
1804 | Robert Eden Duncombe Shafto | |||||
1806 | Richard Wharton | Tory | ||||
1813 | George Allan | Tory | ||||
1818 | Michael Angelo Taylor | Whig | ||||
1820 | Sir Henry Hardinge | Tory | ||||
1830 | Sir Roger Gresley [3] | Tory | ||||
March 1831 | William Chaytor | Whig | ||||
May 1831 | Hon. Arthur Trevor | Tory | ||||
1832 | William Charles Harland | Whig | ||||
1835 | Hon. Arthur Trevor | Conservative | ||||
1841 | Thomas Colpitts Granger | Whig | Robert FitzRoy | Conservative | ||
April 1843 | The Viscount Dungannon [4] | Conservative | ||||
July 1843 | John Bright | Radical/Anti-Corn Law | ||||
1847 | Henry John Spearman | Whig | ||||
July 1852 | William Atherton [5] | Liberal | ||||
December 1852 | Lord Adolphus Vane [6] | Conservative | ||||
1853 | John Mowbray | Conservative | ||||
1864 | John Henderson | Liberal | ||||
1868 | John Robert Davison | Liberal | ||||
1871 | John Lloyd Wharton | Conservative | ||||
February 1874 | Thomas Charles Thompson | Liberal | ||||
June 1874 [7] | Farrer Herschell | Liberal | Sir Arthur Middleton | Liberal | ||
1880 | Thomas Charles Thompson | Liberal | ||||
1885 | Representation reduced to one member |
[edit] 1885-1918
Year | Member | Party | |
---|---|---|---|
1885 | Thomas Milvain | Conservative | |
1892 | Matthew Fowler | Liberal | |
1898 | Arthur Elliot | Liberal Unionist | |
1906 | John Waller Hills | Conservative | |
1910 | Liberal Unionist |
[edit] Durham, Durham/City of Durham (county constituency)
[edit] 1918-present
Year | Member | Party | |
---|---|---|---|
1918 | John Waller Hills | Liberal Unionist | |
1922 | Joshua Ritson | Labour | |
1931 | William McKeag | Liberal | |
1935 | Joshua Ritson | Labour | |
1945 | Charles Grey | Labour | |
1970 | Mark Hughes | Labour | |
1987 | Gerry Steinberg | Labour | |
2005 | Roberta Blackman-Woods | Labour |
[edit] Notes
- ^ On petition, Gowland's election was declared void and his opponent, Lambton, was seated in his place
- ^ Wharton was unseated on petition for illegal practices during the election
- ^ On petition, Gresley's election was declared void and a by-election was held
- ^ Dungannon's election at the by-election of April 1843 was declared void on petition and a new election held
- ^ Sir William Atherton from 1861
- ^ Vane's election at the by-election of December 1852 was declared void on petition and a new election held
- ^ Henderson and Wharton were re-elected at the general election of 1874, but the election was declared void on petition, and neither stood in the ensuing by-election
[edit] Elections
General Election 2005: City of Durham | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
Labour | Roberta Blackman-Woods | 20,928 | 47.2 | -8.9 | |
Liberal Democrat | Carol Woods | 17,654 | 39.8 | +16.1 | |
Conservative | Ben Rogers | 4,179 | 9.4 | -7.9 | |
Veritas | Tony Martin | 1,603 | 3.6 | +3.6 | |
Majority | 3,274 | 7.4 | |||
Turnout | 44,364 | 62.1 | +2.5 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | -12.5 |
General Election 2001: City of Durham | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
Labour | Gerry Steinberg | 23,254 | 56.1 | -7.2 | |
Liberal Democrat | Carol Woods | 9,813 | 23.7 | +8.4 | |
Conservative | Nick Cartmell | 7,167 | 17.3 | -0.2 | |
UK Independence | Chris Williamson | 1,252 | 3.0 | N/A | |
Majority | 13,441 | 32.4 | |||
Turnout | 41,486 | 59.6 | -11.2 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- F W S Craig, "British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885" (2nd edition, Aldershot: Parliamentary Research Services, 1989)
- J Holladay Philbin, "Parliamentary Representation 1832 - England and Wales" (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1965)
- Michael Kinnear, "The British Voter" (London: Batsford, 1968)
- E Porritt and AG Porritt, "The Unreformed House of Commons, Vol I: England and Wales" (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1903)
- Henry Stooks Smith, The Parliaments of England from 1715 to 1847 (2nd edition, edited by FWS Craig - Chichester: Parliamentary Reference Publications, 1973)
- Robert Waller, "The Almanac of British Politics" (3rd edition, London: Croom Helm, 1987)
- Frederic A Youngs, jr, "Guide to the Local Administrative Units of England, Vol II" (London: Royal Historical Society, 1991)
- The Constitutional Yearbook, 1913" (London: National Unionist Association, 1913)
- Leigh Rayment's Peerage Page
Constituencies in North East England | |
---|---|
Labour |
Bishop Auckland | Blaydon | Blyth Valley | City of Durham | Darlington | Easington | Gateshead East and Washington West | Hartlepool | Houghton and Washington East | Jarrow | Middlesbrough | Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland | Newcastle upon Tyne Central | Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend | Newcastle upon Tyne North | North Durham | North Tyneside | North West Durham | Redcar | Sedgefield | South Shields | Stockton North | Stockton South | Sunderland North | Sunderland South | Tyne Bridge | Tynemouth | Wansbeck |
Liberal Democrat | |
Conservative | |
North East European constituency: Labour (1) | Conservative (1) | Liberal Democrats (1) |