From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
Editing Guidelines |
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
|
|
[edit] DYK Appearance
- Here is the article 24 April 2007 as it appeared on DYK. Have fun editing the article. Smee 22:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC).
- Thank you. Though I'm unclear why you post a link to an old version of the article. All the best. Lsi john 02:54, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Because the version "now" may have changed from the version it was when appearing on WP:DYK. Anynobody 10:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
It should be noted here that a 4-time diff diff diff diff accused Troll appears in an article discussion, where he's never edited, and provides an argumentative answer for another editor which does not answer the question.
As the question was posted to another editor, and as Anynobody's reply does not really address why, I will not respond further.
Lsi john 13:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Incidentally, irrespective of impolite User:Lsi john commentary, Anynobody's reply was what I would have probably said anywayz. Smee 14:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC).
- That does not address why. That answer only repeats that the diff points to an archive. It does not say why you did it. The archive exists. Posting a diff to the archive in a discussion which will ultimately be archived, serves what purpose? This is the 'why' that I am asking about. Lsi john 14:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
-
- I'm not joking, the idea of linking to an archived page when discussing WP:DYK, WP:GA or WP:FA is so that the page can be seen as it appeared when it was given the status in question. Anynobody 22:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)