Talk:CipSoft

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.

MMOG logo This article is within the scope of WikiProject Massively multiplayer online games, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of massively multiplayer online games. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the the assessment scale.


Gee, I really should start proofreading material before I submit. OneGyT 22:37, 13 February 2006 (UTC)


Took out the stub thingy, what else is there to say?

omg ur a conservative, intelligent design is freaking criminal —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.215.193.42 (talkcontribs) 23:43, March 11, 2006 (UTC)

I'm not going to argue about politics here. But anyway, aren't there longer articles that still have the stub template on them? OneGyT/T|C 02:33, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
I beleive everything that can be said about Cip has been said here, lets not abuse stubs
Fair enough then. OneGyT/T|C 22:03, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Fixed some vandalism. Maybe a lock if this continues? I'm also going to remove the "Fansites" from this article, because it is based on CipSoft, and the "FanSites" are for their game... --Haktivex 14:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Repeated Vandalism

Wikipedia is a repository for information. Regardless of the tendency of a page to get vandalized, the page should represent an accurate description of the intended topic. As such many of the reverts that have been preformed border on vandalism. Instead of completely removing all content from a page, users should try to edit only the parts of the page that require it. Because of this I am reverting this page in order to preserve past contributions.Darkwraith 14:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

thanks for restoring a more informative version. due to the lack of time i couldn't do this myself but didn't want to let the completely useless article the way it was, so i just removed everything but 1 sentence to get rid of the rants at least. Lodan 16:05, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Putting in fluffy filler words to describe people could be considered vandalism as well - don't put people on a pedastal, that is not information, it's opinion. This isn't a bedtime story, it's a database. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.142.71.132 (talk) 18:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)