From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Cincinnati Bell is part of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions. |
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
Suggested article edit guidelines:
- To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification.
- After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
|
|
Cincinnati Bell is within the scope of the Bell System WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the former Bell System. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
|
Start |
This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
|
Cincinnati Bell in not, and never was a part of the old Bell System. It is an ILEC with it's own personally owned network. – Neville317
Conair Corporation still uses the Bell logo under the Southwestern Bell Freedom Phone brand. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 07:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Recursive Link
Zoomtown redirects to this article, yet the link is in this article. Is there a reason for this? 67.96.20.158 (talk) 18:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Merge Cincinnati Bell Wireless Info
Now that Cincinnati Bell Wireless is wholly owned by Cincinnati Bell, I see no reason we should have two articles (one for the company, and one for one of its services). Also, the company seems to be presenting a new unified services line to its customers. We should consider merging the CBW article into the Cincinnati Bell article to reflect these changes.--Janus657 18:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)