User talk:Cikicdragan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Cikicdragan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links to help you get started:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  RJFJR 20:23, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Divisor

Hi. I undid your edit at divisor, because, as far as I am aware, 0 is indeed a divisor of zero. No problems of dividing by zero show up, and the definition works just fine. Wonder what you think.

By the way, it is good if you use an edit summary when you contribute, and also, it is good if you use the notation Z or \mathbb{Z} for integers, than just Z. These are two small tips. :) Welcome! Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 21:52, 31 January 2006 (UTC)


I'm now studing CS. I've finished electrotechnic high school. Mathematic was my pretty favorite object in high school. Also, I've get some price at math contest during it. I write this for reason that you can see that I'm not so unrelevant - not for reasons of glorifing myself.
I do not have time to read about you. To get some knowledge about you. But, what you did make no sense. I think that still in elementary school teacher said that no one number can be divided by zero. So, please turn back what you did.
Try to divide an apple to no parts. How many you can get? Try to divide to one part. It's goes. About black board notation: I'm pretty new at Wikipedia and I still do not have quite technical knowledge about writing in it. Please, if you want to answer me - ansver at my pages.
Greetings. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cikicdragan (talk • contribs)
I will reply on your talk page too. The thing is, you don't need to divide by zero to deal with divisors. I would suggest you read carefully the definition in divisor, then we can talk. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:03, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Natural number vs positive integer

I undid your replacement at Chinese remainder theorem of "positive integer" with natural number. The concept of natural number is ambiguous, it may mean either positive integer or non-negative integer. For that reason, saying "positive integer" is preferred.

By the way, it is good to use an edit summary at all times, explaining what you changed and why. Just a small suggestion. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

We have always learnt that natural numbers are 1,2,3 and so on. That 0 is integer. I think that we have problems with our science that is different than the rest of the world. Č;-) I doubt that so fundamental things like natural number are ambiguous defined in science like mathematics. --unsigned by Cikicdragan

You may want to read natural number. Things are a bit more compliated than that; different areas of mathematics use different definitions. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 18:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Now I understand why all this. I suppose I will tell that to my professor. I've thought that are fundamental things that are not so easly changable, so I've thought it is redundant to write "positive integer". Sorry. After those two incidence I will be more mindful when I see something strange to me at Wikipedia, especially in Wikimath. :)
Greetings


[edit] No apology

There was no apology neccesary on the Scotland talk page, these arguments......sorry, conversations have been going on for a long time--Jack forbes (talk) 20:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

It is obvious that apology is not necessary but I like to give one if I realize I did some troubles. I'm still shocked of effects I unintentional provoked. -- Čikić Dragan (talk) 13:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] No problem

Thank you for your excuses, but they were not necessary... sorry to you if for me being excessively rough. Good work on en.Wiki and see you soon! --Checco (talk) 16:49, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I say frankly to you that I don't understand if the House of Freedoms is completely disbanded. Indeed sometimes journalists use that expression and actually what you call "new coalition" is exactly the previous coalition without UDC. As of today it has no specific name and probably it can be called "House of Freedoms". --Checco (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Karadzic and Mladic radicals

I really don't know what are you talking about??? which article are you reffering to???--(GriffinSB) (talk) 10:27, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


Oh,that. Well,people who believe in ethnicly pure states,who threaten other nations with disaperance,commit and order genocides,prossecute civilians only because of their identity and believe that their own nation is superior to all others while openly discriminating them are nothing else that fascists.They don't have to be German to be nazis or fascists.Mladic and Karadzic together with the whole political top of Republika Srpska at the time were responsible for ethnic cleansings,mass rapes campaigns,concentration camps,genocides etc. I don't know what else to call them.

How would you call them?Patriots?--(GriffinSB) (talk) 13:38, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Sarajevans will not be counting the dead. They will be counting the living" -Radovan Karadžić in an interview reguarding the siege of Sarajevo, 1993

 --(GriffinSB) (talk) 13:54, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My problem in editing due to my Petition to ban a user

Hi! Thanks for visiting my page. The reason why I took pains in explaining an/or discussing my edits or contributions to any article, since 3 weeks ago, more or less, is: I have a pending complaint to ban or disable user-[1][# 119 Petition to Ban/Block User:Maxschmelling or to Disable his edits on my edits User:Maxschmelling who edits by reverting or deleting almost all of my daily edits since about 3 months ago. What I do is, I have to revert and add again after his deletion. My first adopter User:Ianlopez1115 resigned due to this problem, and, I am presently adopted by User:Diligent Terrier, who was an administrator. So, after each editing or contribution, I have to discuss the notability and propriety of my edit, inter alia. Hoping for your kind understanding of my predicament. Regards, and Good luck. --Florentino floro (talk) 06:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)