User talk:Chunckymonkey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] November 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User talk:Luna Santin, you will be blocked from editing. NeutralHomer T:C 23:58, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

—C.Fred (talk) 00:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "What! harassing other users? i was telling him to stop harassing me. i do not like to be called dude and he called me it after i told him that just to anoy me. his edit was entitled, "dude", and im blocked? shows how new wikipedians get unfair treatment on this sight."

Decline reason: "using "scum" and "fuck you" hardly makes you civil and non-harrassing here. — — Rlevse • Talk • 00:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

  • There's a difference between "dude," which is a slang term, and "scum," which is attack language. [1] Not to mention the edit summary/section heading of this edit of yours. [2] —C.Fred (talk) 00:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

There seems to be a flaw in your reasoning. I said that I appologized for that edit and that it caim out and slipped and i was sorry. That was that. What I am mensioning here is the interactions between me and that Homer guy w/e his name is. He was harassing me. I was not blocked for the edit to Luna, and as I've said, I am sorry for that and stopped after the warning. And then I was blocked for harassing the HOMER user, which I DIDN"T. I do not like being called dude and he onpurposely called me dude just to get me upset. And you can tell that by his edit history when I made that comment telling him not to and then right after he puts as his edit summary quote, "dude". So get your facts strait. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chunckymonkey (talk • contribs) The preceding text was stripped out of a repeated, and thus invalid, unblock request.

During which interaction you made the "scum" remark. In the absence of the f-bomb you dropped on Luna Santin, I probably would have told you to just let it go with Neutralhomer and get on with constructive editing. Because of the combination of the three elements—the comment to Luna, the remark to Neutralhomer, and the continued talk messages to him—that's what got you blocked. So no, I didn't block you directly because of the comment to Luna, but it was a contributing factor to the block. —C.Fred (talk) 00:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Wherever You Are (film)

An editor has nominated Wherever You Are (film), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wherever You Are (film) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)