Talk:Church of St. Peter (Straubing)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA Nominee
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): [[Image:|15px]] c (non-free images have fair use rationales): [[Image:|15px]]
- Overall:
The question marke in 1a is only because the tone of the article isn't quite boring enough. Though everything in it is well sourced, it reads a bit like an original analysis. That could probably be toned down, but I think it passes as it is. Atropos 18:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)