Talk:Church of Scientology v. Gerald Armstrong

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Church of Scientology v. Gerald Armstrong article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

The Arbitration Committee has placed all Scientology-related articles on probation (see relevant arbitration case). Editors making disruptive edits may be banned by an administrator from this and related articles, or other reasonably related pages.

	Scientology Portal This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

[edit] Tone down

Please tone down the bold face. Cheers. V. Joe 11:20, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, Joe -- most of the current bold face is from the style sheet, and I'm hoping it won't be so glaring once some more text is added. TheronJ 12:50, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Correct name of case?

I think this article may be ambiguously named. The article refers to the appellate decision, 232 Cal. App. 3d 1060 [1], but this decision actually only used Armstrong's last name. However, I discovered that the lower court decision from August 10, 1984, in the Los Angeles Superior Court include Armstrong's full name in the case name: Church of Scientology of California v. Gerald Armstrong, case number C 420153. See Ford v. Superior Court, 188 Cal. App. 3d 737, 740 (Cal.App. 1986). Perhaps the ambiguity is too unimportant to justify changing the title of the article. Just wanted to point it out. Taiwan prepares (talk) 11:58, 27 April 2008 (UTC)