User talk:Chryslerfan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Chryslerfan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
There are a lot of tools specifically designed for the Wiki - some of them include special routines that help editors cite outside sources. I think you may have run aground on one of these in the Manatee section - taking a look at WP:CITE might help. Also, while it's a lot to take in all at once, I do recommend that new users take a careful look on the Wiki policies on Reliable Sources and the use of neutral point of view in editing.
Again, welcome! - Corporal Tunnel 19:42, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bellevue
Hi Chryslerfan. Regarding this edit, do you have a source for this information? As you can see, I added a {{fact}} tag. If you have one, please add a reference. · j e r s y k o talk · 01:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, interesting information. First, let me say that I don't doubt the truth of what you're saying. However, because the resignation has not yet been published in a reliable source, it qualifies as original research, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. Typically, this type of information would have to be removed from an article. Given that you do have first hand knowledge of the situation, however, I'll leave it in with the "citation needed" tag for now and hopefully a source will be available soon (I'll look tomorrow). I feel comfortable with leaving the information for a few days with the citation tag while looking for a source, however, another editor could come along and justifiably remove it. If that happens, we will have to find a source to add it again. · j e r s y k o talk · 02:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)