User talk:Christopherdgreen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello :-) I just wanted to thank you for your work on the history of psychology article. Well done. I also like your "Classics" site. --Heida Maria 11:13, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm always happy to talk to another who has been touched by his noodly appendage. Are you a pirate? :-) If you don't mind, please acknowledge this message when you receive it. I've never used User Talk before and I don't know if I am doing it right. Best, Christopherdgreen 03:24, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi again :) It's best to answer people's comments on their own sites (my user page in this case), then they get notified of it. And yes, I'm an aspiring pirate! P-)

I began the article on Town Ball. I notice that a sentence has been inserted saying David Block has "proven" Chadwick's Rounders assertion to be false. I would not use the word proven here, since in 1905 Spalding proved that baseball did not come from Rounders; in 1939 Henderson proved that baseball did come from rounders; in 2005 Block proved that it did not come from rounders. I think that discussion is better suited to the Origins of Baseball page, since this page is neither about rounders nor about baseball. Can we downgrade "proven" into something less dogmatic? Buffalohead 15:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] James Burris Angell

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article James Burris Angell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Sarcasmboy 03:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Redirect of James burris angell

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on James burris angell, by Closedmouth (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because James burris angell is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting James burris angell, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)