User talk:Chrisisinchrist

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Heroes merging

Thanks for the barnstar! :) :) :) -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you!

Hi there! I just wanted to say thanks for all your edits on Heroes! I know it takes a lot of work to get everything verified and I appreciate it! Exclamation point! Magkaz (talk) 03:32, 11 December 2007 (UTC)



[edit] Molly Walker

Brilliant! Keep up improving. The section you added it great. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:07, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Electrobe

Hi CIC, I've been monitoring Electrobe's highly disruptive behaviour of today and thought I should warn you that he has excised some of your comments from the Heroes talk page (diff). As far as I'm aware, deleting or editing other user's entries on talk pages is strictly forbidden on this site. His own talk page is another matter, he's entitled to delete the helpful and friendly comment you left earlier today, but I find his reply insulting (diff): "I no that already please take time to check your facts." ↔ Dennywuh (talk) 17:50, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "In-universe"

Here's a guide that should help... Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction)#Real-world perspective. Cheers. --Ckatzchatspy 19:18, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Heroes talk page

  • Hiya. =) There has been a decent amount of discussion on the Heroes talk page since you last commented in opposition to adding an external link to the Heroes wiki. In an effort to reach consensus I just wanted to make sure you were aware of the recent discussions so that you could check them out and further contribute to the discussion if you're interested. =) --Centish (talk) 04:33, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Company

My apologies. But for future use, if you want to restructure an entire page, it's easier to edit the whole page at once. I also believe that there is a tag for pages so that people will know that you're in the process of editing. Ophois (talk) 20:10, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Comment on Heroes page

Sorry, I was/am suffering from a lack of sleep (you should never edit will sleep deprived, by the way) and was a bit loopy (am a lot loopy) and the edit description left by...whoever left one before me, made me want to write an...opposing edit description ("Commenting so it doesn't seem like people are ignoring you" as opposed to "Ignoring you so it doesn't seem like people are paying attention to you"). In reality, I don't have any opposition to what you're doing, just sleep-deprived is all. ~QuasiAbstract (talk/contrib) 22:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mythology of Heroes

Hello... FYI, I've added the "Inuse" template to the top of the article. You seem to be doing a lot of tweaks right now; the template will alert other editors and hopefully save you the inconvenience of edit conflicts. Just delete the template code (or undo this edit) when you are done. Cheers. --Ckatzchatspy 05:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: peer review

OK, thanks for that. I will make sure to review it soon. ЩіκіRocкs(talκ) 08:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Chrisisinchrist! I'll make my way over to the page to check it out! Thank you for YOUR contributions and efforts as well. Happy Wiki! Magkaz (talk) 19:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Third'd, though I won't have a good chance to review it before tomorrow afternoon. Thanks for the note. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 02:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Got your note. Looks like you have some people at work, so I'll save my time for some others who have made requests. Cheers, Marskell (talk) 18:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] peer review.

I'm a prominent editor? Wow, that's a surprise. I try to be a prominent editor, but it doesn't go over well with some of the people on here who are more highly respected and less lazy then myself. Any opinion or review that i give would be soundly ignored by the other Wikipedians. Of that, i have no doubt. Thanks for your kind words, but you might be better off finding someone else that wouldn't be ignored. If you need help editing or finding a consensus to edit, i might be of some help...but that's all i'm good for. dposse (talk) 21:54, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I have a lot of work in the real world now and I'm trying to deal with an AfD here. On another note, would you mind archiving my talk? All but the last topic have been finished. Therequiembellishere (talk) 23:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Archivation

Thank you so much! I asked someone else, but they must have been on WikiBreak. When I saw you archive the Company, I thought, "Score!" Therequiembellishere (talk) 04:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I found it on one of my watched pages. Therequiembellishere (talk) 05:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sun v Moon on Heroes

Hi there! Sorry about that. I checked on the Heroes website and the DVD cover on Amazon, and it just seems to be a sphere, but i don't have the actual copy so I'm not going to dig my heels in. Anyway, i stand corrected. Hope my other contributions are OK, and keep up the great work on the article :) Ged UK (talk) 18:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Peer Review

I really would not consider myself a "prominent editor", but if you want I will take a look and review the article. Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 15:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Nice to see you appreciate my editing, thanks! I don't have much time now, but I had a quick look over the page and it seems pretty good, although (I haven't really watched Heroes at all so I'm not an expert) but does Christopher Eccelston deserve some sort of a mention? Anyway, I see if I can come up with a few points, which I'll put on the actual PR page. Gran2 16:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: age competition

Thanks for taking part in my comp. You were actually pretty far off. lol. ЩіκіRocкs talκ 06:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your Username

I also wanted to ask you if you have considered changing your username, not changing, but making colourful, like mine: ЩіκіRocкs It would look really good for yours. Bye. (P.S. you're totally not married!) ЩіκіRocкs talκ 06:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC) --Chrisisinchrist comments and complaints here! 07:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)--Chrisisinchrist comments and complaints here! 07:26, 4 February 2008 (UTC) --Chrisisinchrist comments and complaints here! 07:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)--Chrisisinchrist (talk) 07:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

OK. It looks really cool. If you don't mind, could you please spell Christ with a capital? I would appreciate it. Thanks. ЩіκіRocкs talκ 08:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

--ChrisisinChrist comments and complaints here! 17:26, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Heroes

My apologies - got tied up on various other things. Looks like you got lots of useful comments already, so I'll assume it's OK if I duck out of this one. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 21:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Red Dwarf peer review

Hi there, thanks for asking my peer review opinions on the Heroes article. I was wondering if you could return the favour and have a look at the Red Dwarf article and give us an honest peer review. This article has gone through major changes in the last few months, and it would be great if you could head over and give us at the Red Dwarf Wikiproject some sound opinion and ideas on improvements for the page. If you are interested in joining the peer review discussion with other prominent editors, much like yourself, please follow the link. Thanks. Wikipedia:Peer review/Red Dwarf --Nreive (talk) 11:31, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] St. Barnabas Church, Upper Marlboro, Maryland peer review

I was wondering if you could take some time out of your schedule to head over to the St. Barnabas Church, Upper Marlboro, Maryland and give us an honest peer review. The page has evolved quite a bit in the last few months, and it would be fantastic if a prominent editor/contributor like yourself, could head over and give us at Wikipedia:WikiProject Maryland some sound opinion and ideas on improvements for the page. Several of us have worked very hard at improving the page, and we need great outside, reliable and trustworthy users to come over and help us improve. If you are interested in joining the peer review discussion with other prominent users/contributors, much like yourself, please follow the link. Thank you very much for your help and your continued effort to improve Wikipedia and its quality! Wikipedia:Peer review/St. Barnabas Church, Upper Marlboro, Maryland/archive1 Toddst1 (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Heroes Peer Edit and Kyle XY

I added a peer review for Heroes per your request, but there is another topic I liked to talk about, Kyle XY. I am an avid fan and have seen every episode at least twice. That being said the pages here for Kyle XY are borderline-pathetic and need some work. With Season Two wrapping up I think it is time to start making those changes and improve that section. I'd like to know what you think--Vg0131 (talk) 03:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Heroes in Wikipedia

Is there a page that has a list of the Extrodinary Abilities that have been shown and ones that may show up in the future? That way we can link all of their pages, with a one page article, or even a chart, of the ones that have been proven what they are. But ya Mazel Tov on the Heroes work man, congrads--Spread The Word (talk) 15:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter

The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 05:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Peer review idea

Hi, I have made a proposal that no peer review request be archived without some response. To aid in this, there is a new list of PR requests at least one week old that have had no repsonses beyond a semi-automated peer review. This list is at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog.

There are just over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, so I figure if each of these volunteers reviewed just one or two PR requests without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog (as there have been 2 or 3 such unanswered requests a day on average).

If you would be able to help out with a review or two a month from the "no responses" backlog list that would be great (and much appreciated). Please discuss questions, comments, or ideas at the PR talk page and thanks in advance for your help, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kyle XY - Tom Foss

I am working on repairing the Kyle XY pages and expanding them. I've already added the two novels, Kyle XY: Nowhere to Hide and Kyle XY: Under the Radar. I just finished the Tom Foss page as well. Just wanted to know what you thought. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vg0131 (talk • contribs) 03:21, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Heroes (TV series)

Congratulations on an outstanding article, more than deserving its passed nomination for GA! Please pass on the appreciation of the rest of the Wiki community for your team's contribution this project.

As the slowest and laziest of the "esteemed" editors you asked to review Heroes, I conveniently encountered everything in place for me to simply pass it for GA. Let me add, in my opinion, this article is clearly featurable. Please feel free to chase me if you think it would be preferable for me to nominate it for featuring, rather than a member of your team so nominating. Personally, I think it is better a team member nominates, since the team will take responsibility for responding to feedback. Certainly, feel free to quote me as the reviewer who passed the entry for GA and recommended nomination for FA. I will ensure I document that opinion on the article talk page, and explain why.

If you do decide to nominate for FA, as per my recommendation, I volunteer a more timely copy-edit by me than my review has proven to be, since I already know that copy editing will be easy ;). However, you may prefer I keep out of the edit history, since I'm such a fan of your work without being a part of it (yet).

Thanks again, congrats again and cheers! Alastair Haines (talk) 07:45, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Council roll call

Hi there. You are receiveing this message because your name appears on the WikiProject Council participants list. The WikiProject Council is currently having a roll-call; if you are still interested in participating in the inter-project discussion forum that WT:COUNCIL has become, or you are interested in continuing to develop and maintain the WikiProject Guide or Directory, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Participants and remove the asterisk (*) from your name on the list of participants. If you are no longer interested in the Council, you need take no action: your name will be removed from the participants list on April 30, 2008.

Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 22:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April GA Newsletter

The April issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is now available. Dr. Cash (talk) 03:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] refTools

Chris: regarding your note on the Heroes talk page, there is a handy script available which adds a very useful citation tool. (You can read about it here.) The script used to require installation in your monobook.js file,[1] but has recently been added to the "Gadgets" tab (right-most tab) in Special:Preferences. Look in the "Editing tools" section for "refTools". Feel free to ask if you have any questions about it, or any of the other gadgets - there are quite a few good ones now. Cheers. --Ckatzchatspy 05:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I've just used the tool to generate a citation for my earlier note. Cheers! --Ckatzchatspy 05:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] References

  1. ^ Z-man, Mr. (2008-04-01). refToolbar (English) 1. Wikipedia. Retrieved on 2008-04-09.

[edit] WikiProject Good Articles May Newsletter

The May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dharma Initiative

I noticed you reverted a recent edit I made to this article. Generally, when one is making a content revert, it is considered polite to explain the reason for the revert in either the edit summary or on the article's talk page. May I ask why you reverted here? Seraphimblade Talk to me 19:46, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

I apologize if that was confusing. I tweaked the redirect based on a discussion with another editor, to anchor to a specific section rather than the top of the page. The reason for redirecting the article in itself is that its subject appears not to be notable, since the Dharma Initiative does not appear to have significant out-of-universe coverage in reliable sources. Given that, we should not have a full article on it, unless such sourcing does actually exist and can be cited. Seraphimblade Talk to me 12:30, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Peer Review help

Thank you for you work as a peer review volunteer. Since March, there has been a concerted effort to make sure all peer review requests get some response. Requests that have gone three days or longer without a substantial response are listed at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog. I have three requests to help this continue.

1) If you are asked to do a peer review, please ask the person who made the request to also do a review, preferably of a request that has not yet had feedback. This is fairly simple, but helps. For example when I review requests on the backlog list, I close with Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, ...

2) While there are several people who help with the backlog, lately I have been doing up to 3 or 4 peer reviews a day and can not keep this up much longer. We need help. Since there are now well over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, if each volunteer reviewed just one PR request without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog. To help spread out the load, I suggest those willing pick a day of the month and do a review that day (for example, my first edit was on the 8th, so I could pick the 8th). Please pick a peer review request with no responses yet, if possible off the backlog list. If you want, leave a note on my talk page as to which day you picked and I will remind you each month.

3) I have made some proposals to add some limits to peer review requests at Wikipedia_talk:Peer_review#Proposed_limits. The idea is to prevent any one user from overly burdening the process. These seem fairly reasonable (one PR request per editor per day, only four total PR requests per editor at a time, PR requests with cleanup banners can be delisted (like GAN quick fail), and wait two weeks to relist a PR request after it is archived), but have gotten no feedback in one week. If you have any thoughts on these, please weigh in.

Thanks again for your help and in advance for any assistance with the backlog. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Greetings

Hi, you don't know me but you are one of my favourite people on the internet. Its difficult to find someone so open about their faith in Christ online and you have got in shining through in your username. Thats awesome. BTW, you have amazing taste in shows. Heroes, LOST, Kyle XY and Jericho are all my favourite series as well. Chuck and Life are a lot of fun as well. Traveler was great too, pity it only lasted 8 episodes. I also recommend the show Boston Legal, its so quirky and awesome. Check out season 1 on DVD sometime. I also agree that Bionic Woman and Terminator were horrible shows, pity only one of them got the axe. Its also great you're studying child psychology. You'll be able to change a lot of people's lives for good in the future. May God's presence be around you always.

Cheers,
~Richo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.179.188.58 (talk) 11:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Good articles newsletter

Delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 01:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)