User talk:Chrisch/Questions/Archive Apr 2007
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User talk:Chrisch/Questions/Archive Apr 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Contents |
Bomb
I do not see how my edit to bomb was vandalism. If you could lead me in the correct direction, I would be greatly thankful. In case you were wondering, my pronunciation was correct in IPA. Thanks!
69.161.213.251 20:03, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
A response to your question has been posted on your talk page. See: User talk:69.161.213.251. Another user has also asked about the edit, and my reasoning for reverting it is displayed here: Talk:Bomb
Chrisch 03:32, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Global warming bias - not
... Full discussion is shown on the proper talk page: User talk:71.211.241.40
Chrisch 03:03, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
3RR
I'm confused by your message to me; I thought it was appropriate to put back speedy delete messages if they were removed by users? SUBWAYguy 02:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Technically yes, but not more than 3 times per user, otherwise you risk violating the three-revert rule. If a user removed a speedy tag more than once, report the user straight away. Chrisch 03:05, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will try to follow that from now on SUBWAYguy 03:07, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
warnings
chrisch -- the warnings are archived. anyone can look at them at anytime.
they are inaccurate. i have not vandalized any pages. do i have to keep 15 vandalism warnings on my page? everyone that comes assumes they must be correct without looking into thd etails. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.112.7.212 (talk) 05:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC).
Semi-protection
Hi, apparently somebody vandalaised Hamas with different IP address[1]. How can this article be semiprotected?--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 10:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
