User talk:Chrisch/Comments/Archive Dec 2007

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Response to your censorship of my posting.

My posting on Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction where you censored the objectively true statements: "Great controversy was generated when stockpiles of these weapons were not found in large numbers. Small numbers of weapons created prior to the 1991 Gulf War have been located, including artilliary shells designed to hold chemical weapons and mustard gas." with the objectively false statements: "Great controversy was generated when stockpiles of these weapons were not found."

Please note the following links which contain news stores and U.S. Congressional data which substantiate the information I posted and show the information you posted to be obejctively false:

News Stories: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50746 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1120720,00.html http://www.spacewar.com/2004/040701203743.9i07uh3m.html http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120268,00.html

U.S. Congressional Report: http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf

These items together show evidence that 1) chemical weapons including mustard gas and artilliary shells designed to hold chemical weapons were found in Iraq, 2) these weapons were of a limited number (aproximately 500 as of June 2006's Congressional report), and 3) these weapons were created prior to the 1991 Gulf War.

Combined this makes my statement to be unambiguously and objectively true. It makes the statement you reverted to to be unambiguously and objectively false. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.216.117.86 (talk) 03:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dear Internet,

I'm sorry you were offended when I pointed out your errors and then fixed them for you. I know that the Internet is busy and doesn't have the time to copyedit everything it does. I shouldn't have been so crass as to imply that you, the Internet, were personally responsible for your (that is, the Internet's) content.

I am honestly flabbergasted that the note attached to my edit was interpreted as an attack on anyone. It is a humble request from someone so bothered by misuse of hyphens as to waste his time making ignorable changes to Internet pages. Can I please stop capitalizing Internet now? Thank you.

Sincerely,

The Internet User #97.81.104.145 Tilde Tilde Tilde Tilde I mean 97.81.104.145 (talk) 06:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

P.S.: please find enclosed one (1) heartfelt apology, one hundred and eight (108) words of sincere confusion, and also one (1) reminder that 97.81.104.145 (talk) 06:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC) IN BASE FOUR I'M FINE 97.81.104.145 (talk) 06:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC) the Internet is Serious Business (S.B.).

[edit] Is the following correctly cited?

[edit] Theories in the aftermath of the 2003 war

Main article: WMD theories in the aftermath of the 2003 Iraq war

The post-Saddam WMD search began with the fall of Saddam Hussein as ruler of Iraq and the occupation by Coalition forces. Great controversy was generated when stockpiles of these weapons were not found in large numbers. Small numbers of weapons created prior to the 1991 Gulf War have been located, including artilliary shells designed to hold chemical weapons, sarin nerve agent and mustard gas.[1]