User talk:Chris Croy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Chris Croy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Contents

[edit] Matters concerning advocacy of pedophilia

Please refer all matters concerning advocacy of pedophilia directly to the Arbitration Committee. Please don't bring the matter up in other forums. Fred Bauder 12:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Further, please bring these matters to ArbCom's attention via e-mail rather than on-wiki. Your e-mail can be addressed to any arbitrator with the request that he or she forward it to the arbitrators' mailing list. A listing of arbitrators and their contact information can be found at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee. Newyorkbrad (ArbCom clerk), 21:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello, I was browsing the ArbCom noticeboard history today, and I saw this flash by. I was wondering if you could tell me what the explanation for this case was... Never mind, I understand that there was no case at all. Akriasas 01:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (Talk) 20:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] IRC cloak request

I am Chris_Croy on freenode and I would like the cloak wikipedia/Chris-Croy. Thanks. --Chris Croy 20:05, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your comment on the Zeq-Zero0000 workshop

Hi. I saw your comment and concern relating to a proposal I made in the workshop for this ArbCom case. I have replied there, and I hope have clarified and addressed the concern you raised. If you have any other questions please let me know. Regards, Newyorkbrad 00:10, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jew Watch

I am going to respond to you on the talk page. --Blue Tie 00:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Citation

Specifically, I would have liked a citation for "so it is unsurprising that he brokered his first business deal very early in life", particularly the "so it is unsurprising" part... Mad Jack 06:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

I appreciate the compliment, though it's not my finest effort. Cheers! --Kevin Murray 06:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Trivia

Thanks for the cross-check on Reisfeld. I'll see if WashingtonPost.com still has this article online, I not having a hardcopy from back in the day. - B.C.Schmerker 11:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Necro mouse

Did you call me necro mouse? You suck. The mouse is not necrophile, he just don't understand that it is a dead female, because she died recently. It's just stupid animal, even more stupid than some wikipedians. Remove this photo. 16:56, 30 May 1843 (UTC)

It's having sex with a corpse. It doesn't matter if it's just really confused and not actually a necrophiliac, it's still having sex with a corpse. It's by far my favorite picture on Wikipedia, so I'm going to strongly resist any attempt to remove it. Chris Croy 00:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
The article is about necrophilia, not about having sex with a corpse. But if it is your favorite picture (hmmmmmm...) you can put it in mouse. 18:04, 31 May 1915 (UTC)
Hello, maybe the caption whould mention that it is unknown whether the male mouse is sure whether the female is dead or not. --Tom of north wales 17:52, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Peter Serafinowich piccy [[1]]

Sorry, but I seem to had forgotton where I even found that image, hoever I can only assume it was on IMDB.com. Err, I'm pretty unsuire how it's possible to get permission for images off that site, I don't know if thre are any tags which could be used for images off of there... do you?

Thanks anyway --Tom of north wales 17:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Personal Attacks

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. The Parsnip! 02:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Hello Chris. Some of the comments made by you recently were not in good taste and are detrimental to the encyclopedia's functioning and it's users. Please be kind and civil with other users. Yours sincerely, — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 14:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kit Malthouse

The paragraph on the London congestion charge was not meant to imply he was responsible for it or anything along those lines, rather it was meant to point out that he was one of the public opponents of it. I left the prostitution section mostly intact because it was pretty clearly just a re-write of the WSJ article. Chris Croy 22:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry if I wasn't clear. The comment about the source not saying Malthouse was responsible is in regards to the Shirley Porter bit rather than the London congestion charge. And my concern with the prostitution section was that it read like a re-write of an article about prostitution in England rather than one about Kit Malthouse. I've tried to cut it down to what's relevant to the biography, but if I've taken out anything in it that you think is important to understanding Malthouse's position, please do put it back in. And again, thanks for digging up those sources. -- Jonel | Speak 04:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for spending time on Wikipedia instead of your usual weekend hobby of sucking down donuts at Renaissance Faires.
Thanks for spending time on Wikipedia instead of your usual weekend hobby of sucking down donuts at Renaissance Faires.

[edit] Regarding BLP policy

Your comments regarding WP:BLP are fundamentally wrong. I suggest you go read and then re-read what it actually says; replacing unsourced material about a living person which has been challenged is cause for a block. RFerreira 05:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Your edit summary

Regarding your edit here[2], please do not refer to good faith edits as "vandalism." Removal of unsourced material is not vandalism. --Mantanmoreland 18:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)