User talk:Chris Buckey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] The Quatermass Experiment

Hi - noticed your recent edit on the Quatermass Experiment page. Are you sure it's foreign agents? I admit I've not re-read the script book for a couple of years, but I was certain it was journalists. I'll have to re-check to be sure, but I thought I'd ask. Angmering 12:29, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 109th Infantry Division

You listed 109th Infantry Division on Formations of the United States Army, but you made it redirect to the 19th Infantry Division, a World War I division which's activation was cancelled. Why?--SOCL 17:54, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

My mistake. I was expanding the list of formations to include all "phantom divisions" listed in Appendix II of Thaddeus Holt's The Deceivers, and I forgot to expand the 19th Division's entry at the same time. The 109th was actually the 19th Infantry Division's new designation from July 1944 onwards.

Chris Buckey 13:54, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] It's now a deletion review

Hello, Chris Buckey. I'm alerting all of the editors that took part in the the deletion debate for the article Adult-child sex that it is now a deletion review, as seen in this link. I felt that you may want to lend your voice about this topic in its deletion review as well. More on what may happen concerning this topic is discussed here. After reading that, I'm sure that I won't have to tell you to watch for it being put up for deletion again, if this deletion review doesn't come out as Overturn and delete. I'll see you around. Flyer22 20:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] HMS Hood (51) edits

Hello, Chris,

I was puzzled by your recent edit to HMS Hood (51). It is true that Hood was Britain's most prestigious warship in the 1930's, but I cannot see why this should have been a consideration in deferring her reconstruction. My understanding is that she was retained in commission simply because, in a decade marked by a series of war-threatening crises, she could not be spared: until the first of the King George V class were completed, she was the only battleworthy capital ship in the navy capable of exceeding 25 knots, and one of only rhree able to catch a Panzerschiff. Do you have a source for your version of events?

Also, your edits to the description of Hood's material condition seem to pad out the text without clarifying it.

Can I also ask that you provide rather more substantive edit summaries?

I have added this page to my watchlist, in case you prefer to reply here; alternatively, you may wish to post to the article's Talk page.

Regards, John Moore 309 (talk) 15:28, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Museum ship

Hi - could you provide a reference for the "last ship(s) afloat that were present at Pearl Harbour" thing? Not second-guessing you, would be nice to have a ref either way. Ingolfson (talk) 04:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)