User talk:Chris6730

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from causing disruption.

 This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Chris6730 (talk • contribs • block logauto) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

Contents

Image copyright problem with Image:Animalspies1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Animalspies1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:50, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Simpsons WikiProject

Greetings, The Simpsons WikiProect is currently trying to decide on five episode articles to classify as being high importance and as a member of the WikiProject, your input would be appreciated. You can vote here. Thanks for the time, Scorpion 07:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Gamemaker Logo.png

Hello, Chris6730. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Gamemaker Logo.png) was found at the following location: User:Chris6730/Userboxes/Game Maker. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)


The Simpsons WikiProject membership update

The Simpsons WikiProject is performing a membership update to check for currently active and idle members.

Because your username appears on the members list, we kindly ask you visit this page and put your name under the appropriate section, using the code #~~~~, in order to renew or cancel your membership.

If you do not comply with any of the choices, at the end of 1 month after this message was posted, your membership will be canceled and your name removed from the list. If you wish to regain your membership, just sign in again!

The The Simpsons WikiProject team – 01:48, June 9, 2008 (UTC)

Hello Chris

Hello Chris

I live very near Cambridge City Centre and i am a year younger than you, I was wondering if you have an interest in Law Enforcment if you dont thats fair enough no hard done, but if you do you might wanna join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Law Enforcement for more information or if you want to contact me feel free to leave a message on my talk page.

User:Police,Mad,Jack


November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jackie Gleason. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —slakr\ talk / 12:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jackie Gleason, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 12:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Chris6730... we all like a laugh... But you have taken it too far. Please stop vandalising pages, like Jackie Gleason. Fr4zer 12:21, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Last Warning

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at user:Excirial, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User:Excirial, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 12:25, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Your repeated efforts to vandalize articles makes it seem that you are unaware that Wikipedia is a serious project. You have been reported to the administration group for continuing vandalism and an administrator will review your contributions shortly. You may not receive another warning before being blocked, so be careful and be serious from now on. If you are blocked, please reconsider your behavior once the block expires. --Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 12:25, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Jackie_Gleason, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 12:27, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 month. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 12:27, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

vandalism

  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- Kwsn (Ni!) 13:42, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

((unblock|Vandalism wasn't done by me, but by another school student who got access to my account.))

What steps have you taken to make sure that this won't happen again? SQLQuery me! 14:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

I have recently changed my password, and I plan to do so every week. I also make sure to log off everytime when using a public computer now.

For the time being, I've contacted the blocking admin for input. Appreciate your patience in this matter. – Luna Santin (talk) 20:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Says account was compromised, story appears to check out. Discussed with blocking admin and other interested users, didn't catch any disagreement. Stay out of trouble, eh? ;) – Luna Santin (talk) 21:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Request handled by: – Luna Santin (talk) 21:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jackie Gleason, you will be blocked from editing. --Charitwo talk 15:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007

You have been blocked for a period of 17 years from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Oxymoron83 15:47, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Vandalism wasn't done my me, my account was "hacked". 17 years is unreasonable."

Decline reason: "Yes, an indefinite block would have been more reasonable. You are responsible for securing your account and you are consequently responsible for whatever this account does. You should have been aware of this after you were first blocked for having an allegedly compromised account. — Sandstein (talk) 10:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Please stand by as I contact the blocking admin. Sandstein (talk) 10:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I understand that it is my responsability to keep my account secure. And I understand that my repeated failure to log off has caused inconvinence to a number of admins. But I believe that a 17 year ban is not appropriate for a few pages being editted unappropriately by another person. Why should I have to suffer this huge ban?"

Decline reason: "Sorry, but again because the account seems to have been constantly compromised, I cannot, in good conscience, unblock this account. — nat.utoronto 13:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Could you please then, at least, grant me permission to create another account?"

Decline reason: "You are not blocked for using this account; you are blocked for vandalism. There is no indication that another account would be less prone to being compromised. — Sandstein (talk) 17:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This is absurd! You banned my account (for 17 years!) because it could be compromised?! What's saying your account as an admin couldn't be? Under your rules, all wikipedia accounts without security of stone should be blocked! I can't believe this!"

Decline reason: "This page has now been protected due to your abuse of the unblock template. — Yamla (talk) 21:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.