Talk:Chris Howard (American football)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Chris Howard (American football) has been listed as one of the Everyday life good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on December 8, 2007.
February 28, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

[edit] Auto Peer Review

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 19:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GA review

GA review (see here for criteria)

Few small prose tweaks and a citation

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Some prose tweaks and perhaps a bit of expansion
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Like to see a citation for one sentence
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    would be nice to have more coverage of his High school and past-football life. But if the sources are not there, they are not there.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Details:

  • Lede, last sentence of the first paragraph is awkward. I like the non-passive voice, but it feels non-encyclopedic to me. YesY--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 16:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • College section, first paragraph. Last two sentences, consider rewording one of them, they both use "He/Howard also..." which is repetitive.YesY--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 16:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • College section, second paragraph. Consider changing the 5 to five to match the ten you have later. Or change ten to 10. Looks odd, is the best explanation I can give you (grins) YesY--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 16:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Same section, last paragraph. Consider a short explanation that the Hula Bowl is a invitational bowl gameYesY--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 16:25, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Pro career, consider linking or explaining practice squad. YesY--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 16:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Pro career, next to last sentence. "modest" is an opinion. If you can find a quote for that, great. Otherwise it needs to go.YesY--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 16:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • I'd like to see a citation for the very last sentence.YesY--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 16:32, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia:Persondata Know it, love it, use it.YesY done by someone else.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 16:48, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Yeah, it was me that added it (grins). Ealdgyth | Talk 17:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

The main problem with the article is it's short. Very short. I've tried above to give some suggestions on some padding. Is there nothing available on what he's doing now?

  • I tried to pad it with a paragraph about his high school. I have not been able to find out which years he might have won championships although they have won 22 state championships in the last 34 years.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 16:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Gotta love people who don't do anything outrageous. Okies. Ealdgyth | Talk 17:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

You know the drill, I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on.

Heh, at least this time no "Short choppy paragraphs"!Ealdgyth | Talk 15:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Looks good! It's a pass. Taking care of dotting the i's and crossing the t's now. Ealdgyth | Talk 17:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)