From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard. |
|
|
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
- If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
- If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
|
[edit] "Noted royalist"
I'm not sure if this is an accurate description of Baker. From my reading of him (for example in the review of TKNS that appeared on Asia Sentinel) I think he takes a fairly neutral stance towards the King. Is his royalist reputation solely based on his role as the main writer for the latest UNDP report and the pieces for the Nation and Bangkok Post that are off-shoots of the report? Even though he is the "principal writer" the UNDP report is probably a composition of the ideas and believes of a great number of people, and may not reflect Baker's own views. - Naphat 05:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
