Christian Historical Party
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| The Netherlands |
 This article is part of the series: |
|
|
|
Constitution
Cabinet
Decentralized gov't
Foreign policy
Related subjects
|
|
Other countries · Atlas Politics Portal |
The Christian Historical Party (in Dutch: Christelijk Historische Partij, CHP) was a dutch conservative Reformed political party, which existed from 1903 to 1908. The CHP is historically linked to the Christian Democratic Appeal which is currently one of the major parties of the Netherlands.
Contents |
[edit] Party History
The CHP was founded in April 1903 as a merger of two conservative Protestant parties, the Free Anti Revolutionary Party and the Christian Historical Voters' League. Both were turned again the leadership and ideology of Abraham Kuyper, the leader of the main Protestant Anti Revolutionary Party. Kuyper had initiated a new political course for Protestantism in the Netherlands, which included cooperation with the Catholics, in the so-called coalition, strategical support for extension of suffrage a rejection of theocracy in favour of a specific conception of state neutrality, sphere sovereignty and a strong party organization and party discipline. The opposition against Kuyper was led by Alexander de Savorin Lohman, who founded the Free Anti Revolutionary Party.
In 1908 the CHP merged with the Frisian League, another conservative Protestant party, to form the Christian Historical Union
[edit] Name
The term "Christian Historical" was used before 1897 to denote supporters of the main Protestant party, the Anti Revolutionary Party, emphasing the Protestant nature of the history of the Netherlands.
[edit] Ideology & Issues
The CHP was a conservative Protestant party. It saw government as a god-given institution, which should act according to bibical norms. Society should furthermore follow its historical course. Power should not be based on the opinion of the majority but on authority.
The CHP was formed as a result of dissent within the main Protestant party the Anti Revolutionary Party, unlike that party the CHP did not recognize Catholicism as a legitimate religion. The party was strong anti-papist. According to the CHP the Netherlands was a Protestant nation. As such it was hostile to the Catholic segment of society. It renounced the coalition between the Protestant Anti Revolutionary Party and the catholic General League and antithesis between religious and areligious parties. Catholic influences within society should be limited.
The CHP advocated limited government. It supported only limited government interference in the economy and instead advocated charity to help the poor. Furthermore the party opposed general suffrage.
[edit] Representation
In this table the election results of the CHP in Tweede Kamer and Eerste Kamer elections is represented, as well as the party's political leadership: the fractievoorzitter. It also possible that the party leader is member of cabinet, if the D66 was part of the governing coalition, the "highest ranking" minister is listed.
| Year | TK | EK | Fractievoorzitter | Cabinet |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1903 | 10 | 3 | Alexander de Savornin Lohman | supports the cabinet of Kuyper |
| 1904 | 10 | 3 | Alexander de Savornin Lohman | opposition |
| 1905 | 7 | 3 | Alexander de Savornin Lohman | opposition |
| 1906 | 8 | 3 | Alexander de Savornin Lohman | opposition |
| 1907 | 8 | 3 | Alexander de Savornin Lohman | opposition |
[edit] Electorate
The electorate of the CHP was mainly constituted by adherents of the Dutch Reformed Church from the upper class, especially nobility, land owners, high officers and high-ranking civil servants. It won and kept seats in several districts with large reformed populations, Goes in Zeeland, Apeldoorn in Gelderland, Dokkum in Friesland and Katwijk and Schiedam in South Holland.
[edit] International Comparison
As a party for Protestant dissenters of a catholic-Protestant alliance the CHP is a unique phenomenon in international perspective. Its political course, which included support of limited government, rejection of universal suffrage and hostility against Catholicism, is comparable to the course of the British Conservative Party in the late 1800s and to some extent American Party of the United States.
|
||||||||||||||
