Talk:Chocolate/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Uh, about the "GA" rating... I thought the article was GA or A-class, and I thought it would be probably safer to rate it GA for now... but it is very close to A-class. I'll list some reasons and stuff later becuase im busy. -- Chris ^Ccool2ax _contrib. 03:16, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Some things I found that could be made better:

• The "Origins" and "etymology" sections are well-written, but entirely uncited. I don't see anything indicating where the info came from.
• This is probably just me, but wouldn't the "Types of Chocolate" section work better as a definition list?

Otherwise, this is clearly a very good article, and with a tiny bit of effort I'd give it an A. But then again, a better reviewer might come along first. -- Chris ^Ccool2ax _contrib. 03:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC)