Talk:Chitra Bharti Kathamala

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
More information about this article...

anupam 09:25, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Guys I am stuck with the warning. All the informations provided here are trustworthy. I have the books of the publications and I wrote only what i am sure of. Please, help me out...

anupam 16:41, 19 June 2007 (UTC) So dear Wikipedia administrators. No one is coming to help. Now tell me what should I do. I know Wikipedia is considered as a standard so the articles correctness should be made. But sometimes it becomes rediculous. When you guys post doubt, you should also know whether you are doing the right thing at the right place or not. I know I will get an irritating kind of answer for that, so let me ask you, you imposed doubt so you tell me, how much you geniuses out there know about these indian comics.

I am trying to create information on Indian comics left out in wikipedia, but with this attitude i don't think, I would be eagar to contribute in the future. OK YOU WANT THE AUTHENTICITY, I WILL TELL YOU WHERE I GOT THE INFORMATION. EVEN AFTER THIS YOU WISE GUYS/GALS HAVE PROBLEMS, DO ME A FAVOUR DELETE THE PAGE. I WANT TO CREATE ENCYCLOPEDIA ON INDIAN COMICS AND THAT I CAN DO ON MY OWN WEBSITE WITH UNRESTRICTED USE OF IMAGES TOO. OTHERWISE, I HAVEN'T PUT AN IMAGE, I WOULD GET AGAIN THE 'TELL SOURCE' AND OTHER HELL OF THINGS.

LETS START BY SECTIONS ON MY ARTICLES ON INDIAN COMIC PUBLISHERS -

Contents

[edit] BRIEF HISTORY

  • I have a whole lof of these comics. I am collecting and purchasing them for the last 23 years when I was only 5 years old (Now I am 28). So I have written this comics is published by [Publisher], I think I am capable of reading the publisher's name and address from the comic book.
  • Their active duration is also found from the date of publication of the comics. almost every comic companies gives ad like coming this sep 1992 or so alike. After that I have mentioned the time period as late 80s or early 90s. These are broad category and can't be wrong. Don't you know how old you were when some of your favorite comics used to come.
  • The popularity measure - I was a member of the library and also purchased these comics. So the sources at the library can tell you and you can also find out yourself when a comic was issued by so many customers and the library used to have 3-4 copies of them, that comic is popular. Also the 'sold out' at the book seller told you that they are popular. RIGHT GENIUS WIKIEINSTEINS

[edit] Frequency =

The list of the comics of the current month and the forthcoming title list tells you clearly the frequency and no. of comics published each months. When a subscription form tells you to send a sum of money for yearly subscription (24 issues), i think you guys can guess that they are published in a fortnight. Languages too are mentioned like 'AVAILABLE IN HINDI AND ENGLIGH'

[edit] Head Office

Do I need to mention again, they are printed in the comics itself.

[edit] Characters

I have a lot of comics. So i know some characters. Again the list of current and forthcoming tiles and the available comic list shows you the names of the characters. Or When I find the ad for a Wonder Woman comic in Superman comics, Wikipedia will object and again want a reliable source or reference from me. I am going Bananas

[edit] List of comics

If a comic contains the list of available comics. Do I need to send you the comics so that you responsible guys would check it out.

EVEN AFTER THIS LONG-LONG CLEARIFICATION, YOU WANT REFERENCE AND DENIES TO REMOVE THE STUPID TAGS, DO ONE THING, WRITE TO ME I WILL GIVE YOU MY HOME ADDRESS. COME-VISIT-CHECK THE INFORMATION ON THE BASIS OF MY COLLECTIONS. OR JUST SEARCH FOR THE PUBLISEHRS YOURSELF . IF NOT THEN JUST SHUT YOUR MOUTH (PARDON MY EXPRESSIONS, BUT WHEN YOU WORK HARD, AND SOME GUYS WHO KNOWS NOTHING RAISE DOUBT, ITS IRRITATING) AND AGAIN IF YOU CAN'T DO REMOVE MY ARTICLE.

I CAN'T REFER YOU TO ANYWHERE, CAUSE THERE IS NOTHING ABOUT THEM ON INTERNET. I HAVE PROVEN THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE ARTICLES. SO DO WHAT YOU WANT. BUT SOON... TILL THEN I THINK I SHOULD WAIT BEFORE PUTTING ANYMORE EFFORT ON WIKIPEDIA

WITH THIS MUCH CLEARIFICATION, I WOULD HAVE CREATED ARTICLES ON ATLEAST 3 MORE PUBLICATIONS, BUT WHO IS GOING TO EXPLAIN THE SCEPTICAL GUYS HERE. RIGHT???

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Space star.JPG

Image:Space star.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Junior James Bond 005.jpg

Image:Junior James Bond 005.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 15:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)