Talk:Chionoecetes bairdi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] {fact}
I do recognize that this article is already tagged and needs citations. But there is some material in here which I can personally vouch for and therefore I do not intend to touch it. This statement that I am adding {fact} to is, to the best of my knowledge, utter nonsense, and I intend to delete it, specifically, if no support is provided. So I do not consider the usage to be redundant. Unschool 09:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- And now I see that you've actually proven my point, Stemonitis. You removed my {fact} request from the article, then added a fine source yourself, and removed the {unreferenced} tag. Fine work, except that your source, excellent though it is, in no way addressed my concern.Unschool 09:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)