Talk:Chingiz Mustafayev

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chingiz Mustafayev article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

WikiProject Azerbaijan This article is part of WikiProject Azerbaijan, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.


[edit] Dispute Tag

A totally dispute tag has been added, I dont know why but somebody please explain the reason for the tag. Chingiz Mustafayev is a Azeri patriot and the man who filmed the Khojaly Massacre and he did made 18 documentaries about the war and eventually in less then a year he died in Agdam, I dont know whats totally disputable about that? Baku87 18:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)Baku87

All of the given sources are from Azeri propaganda sites, every single one of them and therefore they are not reliable. Second of all the language in the article is extremely pov and biased: town had been wiped out and Armenians had ruthlessly slaughtered women.--Eupator 17:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
chingiz was the man who filmed the khojaly massacre, its ridiculous to deny this. he was the man behind the camera and we have loads of visual evidence that the people were ruthlessly slaughtered, so what the heck is totaly disputed about this? i changed into just disputed instead totaly disputed. what kind of proof do you want? Karabakh 12:45, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
The tag isn't for the factual accuracy alone but for the neutrality and the unecyclopedic tone of the article.--Eupator 14:04, 1 June 2006 (UTC)