Talk:Chinese Islamic cuisine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
Islam This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Islam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Xinjiang food, and this page on Chinese Islamic Cuisine are not talking about the same kinds of food. All the pictures might be from other parts of China--but certainly don't reflect Uyghur or Hui cuisine of Xinjiang. Should we start a new page on Xinjiang Cuisine, or change this page? Some things have similar names. . .--Erkin2008 21:07, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

When I wrote the first draft of this article back in 2001, I was writing about the 清真菜館 based on those I tried in the USA. I had no knowledge of what Xinjiang cuisine was all about. This article has evolved over the past 6 years and like most wikipedia articles, it has become a bastardized collection of multiple related topics because each author has a different interpretation of what the title means. Remember the story about 4 blind men describing an elephant? That is what most wikipedian articles are like, most parts are correct, but when put together, the full picture is nothing like the truth. I'd suggest you either spin off a different article or split the article into multiple sections, one for each variation from different part of the world. Kowloonese 23:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC)