Talk:Chiltern Main Line
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Last paragraph
Surely the last paragraph is somewhat subjective? -- 80.41.215.203 16:26, 21 Apr 2005
- I have clatrified 'rubbish trains'; I presume that is what this comment was about. The last para now reads:
-
- The line from Northolt Junction to Paddington alone has not been improved, and only one Chiltern train a day from Princes Risborough, and back, uses it, and only during the week. Freight trains carrying refuse from London use the line, however, and it has been used as a diversion when work is taking place on the line to Marylebone, or when the normal line into Paddington is closed.
- which seems perfectly NPOV to me. What I don't understand is the last phrase and what exactly is thw 'normal line into Paddington'?. -- Chris j wood 20:09, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Split article?
Should this article be split up into several new articles? The suggested new article names are below. Our Phellap 23:07, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
- Chiltern Main Line - just Marylebone-Birmingham Snow Hill
- London to Aylesbury Line
- Leamington to Stratford Line
- Leamington to Coventry Line
- Princes Risborough to Aylesbury Line
[edit] Oxford-Banbury spur?
The section on 'future' suggests that Oxford-Banbury could be transferred to Chiltern as a consequence of a new Oxford-Risborough line; given that XC use the line as a key part of the Reading-Birmingham route, would it not be unnecessarily confusing to move this to Chiltern? 62.239.159.6 (talk) 13:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Line Speeds and History
I just added a bunch of info on line speeds and reformatted the History section to remove the "wall of text" effect. I'd appreciate any feedback available. -User:TheOneKEA (20080530 18:33) —Preceding comment was added at 22:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)