Talk:Children of the Corn: Revelation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film. Article upgrading needed: You can help! WP:IA   Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films Note that instructions for articles on other types of film topics within the scope of WikiProject Films are currently under development. To contribute in upgrading this stub article to Start class, the following requirements must be met: Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.) Film infobox ({{infobox film}}) Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image. Non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible, but if used should include a detailed fair use rationale. (An image is not required for start class if unavailable.) Plot summary Include cast and crew information. At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, themes, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.) Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))  Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF, WP:WAF Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to Start class and this template will be removed automatically.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

	This article, category, or template is part of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to horror film and fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.

[edit] "Best of the sequels"

Have removed these two claims made by 70.17.189.179 about this film being "generally considered the best of the sequels" because every site I've visited contradicts this:

• "It's not as bad as a few of the previous sequels, but it does still kinda suck." [1]
• "Children of the Corn 666: Revelation is a horrible sequel just like most of the other instalments..." [2]
• "Spooky ghost" take on the Corn series leaves us with a bore job instead of a gore job." [3]
• "This movie is certainly not the worst in the series." (Still doesn't mean it's the best!) [4]

If someone can find a reliable source that claims it is the best of the sequels, then by all means add it, but it's not "generally" considered the best of the sequels. Somno (talk) 03:22, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Changed "Gatlin" to "Omaha", as the movie took place in Omaha... Not Gatlin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.216.53.66 (talk) 23:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Plot

I'm just going to copy across the same text I just wrote on the Talk page for Children of the Corn: Revelation. I have tried to contact the editor directly but they seem to be on a different IP address every time they edit, so never receive my messages.

I appreciate the amount of work that's gone into expanding the Plot section, but please spell-check what you enter and make sure it makes sense. Also, the Manual of Style for WikiProject Films recommends that plot summaries are 400-700 words long, and the current plot summary for this film is nearly 980 words long, which is completely unnecessary. Please try to keep to these guidelines. It's supposed to be a summary of the plot, not an exact description of every small occurrence in the film. Thanks. Somno (talk) 07:27, 7 January 2008 (UTC)