Talk:Child Discipline Act

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Use the official title, with redirect at commonly used names? 58.28.133.63 10:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I have no objection to the move. I knew when I created the article that it would probably not stay at this title for long. However, let's take a few days to discuss the best title so it doesn't get moved more than once.

Would including the year be useful, as is common for most Acts of Parliament? That would make the title Crimes (Abolition of Force as a Justification for Child Discipline) Amendment Act 2007 (currently a redirect).-gadfium 20:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

The article should be at the most common English name, not at the official name. Is Child Discipline Bill the most common name? —METS501 (talk) 01:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

I think Child Discipline Bill (or more correctly Child Discipline Act) would be the most widely recognised name of those which are reasonably accurate. The Anti-Smacking Bill is probably better known but is a misconception of the purpose of the act.-gadfium 06:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.