Talk:Chief Osceola and Renegade

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Florida State University This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida State University. If you would like to help, you can edit this article or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. Start
This article has been rated as a Mid priority article Mid
To-do list for Chief Osceola and Renegade:

Here are some tasks you can do:
    This article is part of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, which collaborates on Native American, First Nations, Inuit, Métis and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
    ??? This article has not yet been rated on the assessment scale.

    Please rate this article and leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

    [edit] Osceola and Renegade are not mascots

    i understand the conflict, the Illini might have had a problem but the distinction is that FSU does not have an official mascot. The Seminoles are a symbol of the school and the article must represent this.--68.35.201.31 (talk) 12:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

    The PC is annoying already. The Seminoles are not the Illini and the Seminole Tribe of Florida has sanctioned the use of the SYMBOLS Of Osceola and Renegade. They are not to be infered upon as mascots. --UkrNole 485 (talk) 12:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
    Just the fact that you are referring to this as Political Correctness shows your bias against this and is not civil. They can sanction the term "symbol" all they want, but conventional definition is mascot. Please see the Talk:Chief Illiniwek#Third Opinion for a relevant discussion and precedence for using both terms. Please keep the POV drama off the article. Justinm1978 (talk) 13:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
    This rewrite can be seen as a fair compromise, indicating the universities stance as well as the common view. I think it important to acknowledge the position of accepted reference first. This is encyclopedic again I understand the topic has been discussed on another page but the truth of the matter is that the Seminole tribe as stated “these symbols are approved” they did not condone or use mascots. Mascots have a demining tone. This is getting heated for no reason, people sould leave it alone an see to why it was written in a way in the first place.--Nolephin (talk) 16:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)