Talk:Chico Xavier

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag
Portal
Chico Xavier is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Brazil and Brazil-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.

Contents

[edit] Notes

This section: "A letter channelled by Chico Xavier from a supposed victim of a murder once helped to establish the innocence of the presumed murderer. The case became nationally famous because the case had already been tried and a man was convicted. The letter caused new investigation and the real murderer was arrested.[1]"

The article referenced has got the facts wrong. The case in question was indeed a murder, but not as told in that article. The victim was shot by a friend, who was, according to the shooter, showing him a weapon that went off by accident. The letter channelled from the victim simply stated that what had happened was an accident, and no-one's fault, and that his friend (the shooter) wasn't guilty of any wrong doing. The letter was accepted as evidence on a first trial by the judge. That judgement was thrown off and the letter was accepted again in a second trial by jury. In both cases the man was considered not guilty. However no "real murdered" was ever arrested, as there wasn't anyone else involved. The victim's family also accepted the letter as legitimate. As told in "As Vidas de Chico Xavier (2003)" and "Fantastico - Rede Globo (1997)" with interviews from all parties involved (except the dead man :)

Then, is it possible that the process was thrown on a technicality or for some other reason? Do we have plenty evidence that the letter was really decisive? jggouvea 00:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Recorded Light

Deleted this section. Whoever wrote it please write it again for clarity. -WakingSetember 19th, 2006.

[edit] Nobel Peace Prize

  • Chico Xavier was recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1981 and 1989 but did not win because of his scarce popularity elsewhere in the world. Although he did not win either of the nominations, his popularity remained unchanged in Brazil.

Being nominated for the Peace Prize is an honor, but it is not official and not necessarily prestigious. Any national legislator or about a third of the university professors in the world can make a nomination, and there have been as many as 140 some years. Nominators are requested to keep their nominations secret, so it's only those wishing publicity who make announcements. Altogether, I see no reason to keep it. No offense to the subject, this is a general Nobel Peace Prize "nominees" issue. -Willmcw 03:57, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Emmanuel name

In the book "Há 2000 anos" the Emmanuel's name was Públio Lentulus. I don't know if it's an Portuguese adaptation. Should we modificate the name in the article?

No. "Há 2000 anos" was supposedly authored by the spirit Emmanuel by means of Xavier's mediumship. In that book the spirit tells a story that happened to him in one of his lives, one in which his name was Publius Lentulus, a Roman personage who supposedly lived from 10BCE to 65CE. It is clear when you read the book that Emmanuel and Lentulus are two different characters, yet the same person (that's reincarnation, after all...) jggouvea 17:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

I know that. The question was about how is the correct spelling. If it is Públio or Publius. I know that the Portuguese version is Públio, but I don't know if the English translation is Publius. dmelorj

[edit] Request for English links

A quick search on Google reveals only Portuguese pages. Thanks.--Jondel 09:53, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

  • I have included two English links. Renato Costa 17:14, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Category change

Categories have been changed in accordance with the recent Arbitration on the paranormal, specifically 6a) Adequate framing, and Cultural artefacts. Martinphi (Talk Ψ Contribs) 21:07, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

in the box at the rigth, named spiritualist topics, I must tell you that "fortune-telling" cannot be related with Spiritism by no meaning. Spiritismo is philosophy, with moral consequences, and respects Science. It's a Christian philosophy and his goal it's to live according to the Gospel of Jesus of Nazareth. Fortune-telling is a frivolous activity that spiritists NEVER do! Ricardo/Portugal —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.129.235.235 (talk) 20:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)