Talk:Chickasaw Turnpike
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Good article review
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- Is it neutral?
- Is it stable?
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Overall:
This article is beautiful. Hard to say there's any problems with it. It meets all criteria for GA status.Mitch32contribs 20:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm a map freek and I've wondered about this road for years. Now I know. Thanks--Phyllis1753 (talk) 16:52, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Promotion to A-Class
I'm pleased to close out the WP:USRD A-Class review as a promotion with 5 net supports (5 supports, 0 oppose). Imzadi1979 (talk) 05:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Categories: Wikipedia featured articles | Old requests for peer review | FA-Class Oklahoma road transport articles | High-importance Oklahoma road transport articles | FA-Class U.S. road transport articles | High-importance U.S. road transport articles | FA-Class Oklahoma articles | Low-importance Oklahoma articles