User talk:Chetblong/Archives/2007/June

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Re: I can't see my new version.

There's nothing more to be done; the "listen to this article" link in the article always (automatically) points to the latest audio version that's been uploaded. I'm not really familiar with Yahoo! Music Jukebox, but my guess is that they're still serving the older version. Download it directly from the Wikipedia page and play it with an Ogg-capable player (VLC is a good one, because it'll play Ogg Vorbis without you having to download any extra codecs) and you'll get the latest version. -- Macropode 09:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Nice work. Your audio editing's getting better! Review here.-- Macropode 08:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Engaging in dialogues

Hi there, in regards to the way you are writing your comments in the discussion on the talk page of the Criticism of Windows Vista article, I would like to point out that when you insert your response between someones else's comments, it makes the entire thing hard to follow. Like when you inserted your response between paragraphs of Warren's comment, even though it keeps the answer closer to the point where the issue was raised, someone who is following the discussion has to hunt through the pile to figure out new info (no diffs are not that helpful for large discussions). As such, it is better to respond below someone else. Even better, refer to the point that was raised before you put down your answer. Thanks, and regards. --soum (0_o) 17:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Okay, my mistake. You didnt do that. But the way you used indents made it seem like you were inserting your answers between others. Sorry. So, when you have to quote someone or some article, instead of using indents, I think it would be better if you just italicize and use quotation marks to demarcate that. --soum (0_o) 17:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

That's OK I'll do what you suggested. -- Chetblong 17:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for doing this, Chetblong, it really helps. -/- Warren 17:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Your Page.

Dude I'm sorry, but THANK YOU for welcoming me!--Tdjzcsdrpf 23:24, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Adminship nomination

You dont have to do anything when nominating self. If you are nominated by someone else, they put the time of nomination. When you are accepting, you should change to the time of acceptance, so that it is kept open for 7 days since acceptance. --soum ^talk 16:25, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

You are welcome. And all the best with the RfA. Most evaluators look quite some experience. You are a good editor, you are lacking in experience. Also, even in self nomination, you have to explicitly state that you are accepting, just before the questions. --soum ^talk 16:34, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Your Rfs is not considered active till you explicitly state acceptance of nomination. See mine. --soum ^talk 16:46, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah I missed that question. But you could have followed up on that. Plus that was hardly a response to the issue I raised: that all (but maybe an isolated incident or two) are notable people whose opinions can (and it does) sway people's perception. As such, the issue becomes notable. Instead of answering how this is irrelevant, you point out that I have given only one incident in the example (its just an example, why should I reiterate everything that is in the article?) How was that a relevant response to a question raised against your suggestion? Anyways, we can continue this discussion on the talk page. For now, try to gain some experience with how things work here from the RfA. --soum ^talk 17:35, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Plus there are also general issues with your contribution. You uploaded a few fair use images but all lack a fair use rationale. This things will be pointed out in RfA. Please try to rectify them. --soum ^talk 17:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I will respond to your comment tomorrow. I will be signing out in a few minutes (My lab is going to close for the night). See you tomorrow. --soum ^talk 17:41, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for your persistent reverting of vandalism to my user page tonight. I really appreciate that. --Bonadea 19:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Your recent RfA

I'm sorry, but I've closed your Request for adminship prematurely. Simply put, you've only got 365 edits on Wikipedia; while edit count isn't the only determining factor, and numerous people have their own personal standards that they judge RfA candidates by, there was no chance that the RfA was going to pass.

I'm sorry about this, and hope you don't take it personally. If you continue to contribute to the project in a positive fashion, I'm confident that you could possibly run a successful RfA in the future. You may want to consider submitting yourself to Wikipedia:Editor review for feedback on where to get some good experience, and when you're ready for RfA again, there's a great Wikipedia:Admin coaching program for you to use, as well as a guide to requests for adminship.

If you have any other questions about becoming an administrator, please don't hesitate to ask me. Good luck! Evilclown93 23:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Award

Hey Chetblong. Here is the award that you've earned by finding my super secret you-know-what.

		The Hidden Link Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Chetblong for finding the super secret hidden link on Selfworm's page! Good job!

Congratulations! _selfworm_ ^{( Talk · Contribs )_} 00:40, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Your RfA

I am sorry it was closed early. Don't take it personally. Your lack of experience is what went against you.

I would have said this earlier, but didn't so that you weren't discouraged from that RfA. And due to this reason only, I did not vote there. Lack of experience is the most serious question. You have 300 odd edits in total, and a majority of them have been welcoming newcomers. While that is definitely a very noble thing to do, it does not show how good a contributor you are to the content of wikipedia. We are here primarily to build a quality repository of informative content, not to build the largest database of registered users. Also, low main space edits obscure how good an understanding you have of Wikipedia policies. About the fair use images, after I pointed that out, you rectify them with just adding a template that says it has fair use rationale, but not adding any rationale whatsoever. This lack of understanding of policies and their enforcement can be excused for a new inexperienced user, but cannot be the virtues of a administrator. Take a look at WP:FURG on how to add good rationales. As for the answer to my question, your response has been rather unsatisfactory. Of course you gonna sort it by talking, thats the only thing you can do here. In the conflict, your interpretation was against everyone else's. In this case the answer that I was looking for was that you would dig up precedents of such conflicts from other similar articles and see how it is handled in general in Wikipedia. If it is not the way other editors are handling it, show them and resolve on those lines. If they indeed are doing it that way, assume the tried and tested way is better and respect consensus till you can come up with a definitive flaw in that. Sure, a better answer would have been awesome but this was the least I was looking for. Anyways, the limited main space contributions that you have has been good. And you are a good vandal fighter. But that is not enough to judge whether you can be trusted with additional powers. Do not take this as hatred against you, no. Interpret this as a pointer to where you need to improve to show others that you indeed can shoulder the responsibility. Keep contributing to articles, vandalism reversion and non compliant article deletion. Take part in deciding whats to be done with them (xFDs, AN, AIV, UAA), and leave the enforcing to us for the time being. Once you gain enough experience, I am sure you will qualify then. Good luck. --soum ^talk 08:44, 9 June == 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou for forgiving me dude--Tdjzcsdrpf 00:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Help

Hey, can you help me to put a picture on a page(Chester Middle School)

--Tdjzcsdrpf 00:46, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Sure

Thanks for the invite to Gnome week, I'll try to participate. Thanks for all the tips--Tdjzcsdrpf 22:05, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Hey

Can you give me a simplified version of adding pictures--Tdjzcsdrpf 22:07, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

I thourght I was reverting vandalism from that page sorry Genda change help us 14:45, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Your Welcome

Any time buddy. MaximusNukeage 17:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Tahnks for the simplified version. It makes more sense.--Tdjzcsdrpf 19:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Dude thanks for the recognition on your home page. Can you help me do up my page like yours. Hope you had a good Wikibreak!--Tdjzcsdrpf 19:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Your page

Hey, I noticed that on your user page you wrote "My Veiwpoints". I corrected it "..Viewpoints". If it was supposed to be like that I'm sorry --Tdjzcsdrpf 20:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Re:Gnome Week

	Gnomes, unite!
	You are invited to participate in Gnome Week, a mass article cleanup drive between June 21 and June 28, 2007.
	This week, backlogs will be cleared. Articles will be polished. Typos will be fixed. Bad prose will be edited. Unreferenced articles will be sourced. No article will be safe from our reach! The more people who participate, the better Wikipedia will become as a result.
	I would love it if you would participate! - Zacharycrimsonwolf
Edit message

Dynamic Submission

I blanked the article, since another editor couninously harrassed me as I was writing it, and kept tagging it. I told him to leave it alone for 1 hour while I wrote it but every minute there was an edit confict, he is manipulating the article because I afd one of his. Being spiteful. Artilce is blanked, I will write the bloodly thing offline when I have time and post the whole think at once. People like this make me SICK!--Akc9000 22:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Furthermore

This user Jehochman is trying to interfere with my edits because I called his editing shoddy on Search Engine Land and he imployed sockpuppets to try to get his way. I did not vandilze my own article that he is trying to twist.--Akc9000 22:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

What you are writing, Akc9000, is an advertisement (see What Wikipedia is not). One way or another, such articles do get deleted from this encyclopedia. — Athaenara ✉ 23:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

This editor has something against this product and or products like it because he line of work is in SEO and this product does what his company does for free for the customer! Just look at his site and what he does for a living. I have reverted the article to exactly how it was when it came out of deletion review. I have no more time to work on it tonight, This editor has plagued me for two hours now with this. Since it was undeleted in its current form, I would say it should be fine until tomarrow. I tried to explain to the other editor that I was revamping the article as a general SEO software article but he just would not leave it alone long enough for me to finish. --Akc9000 23:09, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

THANK YOU!!

Man, I hated that autoblock. I couldn't even do anything to MY page. Thanks for putting the userboxes on my page!--Tdjzcsdrpf 23:46, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Your Welcome -- :) Chetblong 23:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Help

Can you help me get a userbox for Basketball and one for Maggie L. Walker Governor's School I'd like the picture on that page to be on my box( the one in tox to the left)--Tdjzcsdrpf 23:50, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Again!

Thank you for searching for me. I would look if I knew how. See if you can find the hidden comment on my page. I can't. But are supposed to be able to find it? :)))--Tdjzcsdrpf 23:58, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the basketball box. If I'm annoying you with all these messages, you can tell me to stop--Tdjzcsdrpf 00:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry I'm not annoyed. :) Chetblong 00:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Kabbalah article revert

"(Reverted 1 edit by 24.57.242.244 identified as vandalism to last revision by MartinBot. using TW)"

My computer is working very slow now, and I can not quite figure out what was reverted, or why. Was it a problem with my editing? or was it something else that I did not notice? If it was something I did incorrectly, explain it to me and I will try to avoid the problem in the future. Kwork 00:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm...

I'd like "This user attends ....."--Tdjzcsdrpf 00:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

t

Thanks--Tdjzcsdrpf 00:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Your Welcome -- :) Chetblong 00:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

 ?

Hey, How can I join the welcoming committe, and what would I have to do after I join--Tdjzcsdrpf 00:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Finishing up Dynamic Submission

Hi, I have a question. What makes this software product noteable is the fact that it won an award from PC Magazine and the fact it is actually written about in books. Can I list this info as it is? Because if it is removed, I do not see how the cites would make it noteable. In deletion review the reason why it was undeleted were this two cites now this conflict came up between me and the other editor becuase he wants to remove the cites and say the product does not work and I want the cites there. I also am working on a general article on this class of software program. This whole thing started when I put the example of the report from search engine submission software into this article. I have no idea why he says it is not an encylopedic example, it is an example of what this type of program does. Could you please clarify for me and have a look at the article dynamic submission for me. I just dont see it being written as an ad. I have written other articles many about hardware products without a peep from anyone. I just think this editor is pissed that I afd his article so he just wants this one deleted out of spite.

Please let me know what I need to do to improve it further. Thanks! --Akc9000 00:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

HELP

Hi and thank you, I will work on it now. I need help with this editor. He is driving me crazy. Since I afd his article, he follows my edits to complain about them. But he only complains when they are directly in his field of work. I have written other articles that he does not touch, just everything that has anything to do with search engines or seo work. This is what he does for a living. I think it is he that has a COI he manupulats things to increase his income and I have a feeling that I cannot prove he is getting a kickback from someone. It is very, very strange. I started to work on search engine submission software and he tagged it within minutes of me working on it. Something is up with this guy. Can anything be done?

Anyway, back to the other article. By the time I am done fixing it the new one I am working on will be up for speedy deletion by this guy! He is driving me crazy. He does not wait 5 minutes. I think he is just looking at my history of edits and following me. HELP! --Akc9000 01:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Dynamic Submission Completed

Done! Please have a look at the finished article at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Akc9000/backup

I would like to know your opinion of this article no matter what. Tell me the truth how it looks please. Thanks!

Someone Deleted it while I was writing this note! Now what? This is just unbelievable! Luckily, I made a backup. --Akc9000 02:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Dynamic submission

I wouldnt classify the article as blatant advertising, deltable under WP:CSD#CSD G11. But it definitely has a promotional tone to it (which is in violation of WP:NPOV). Consider placing an {{advert}} tag on the article.

However, since it is in userspace, I would avoid touching the article, rather point out the problems to the user to bring their attention on what needs to be fixed. Regards, --soum ^talk 16:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for clarifying that for me. :) Chetblong 16:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the MLWGS box and the info--Tdjzcsdrpf 20:55, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Your Welcome! :) Chetblong 15:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Hey

I joined the welcoming committee--Tdjzcsdrpf 23:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Editor review

I reviewed you. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. --wpktsfs 01:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank You. -- :) Chetblong 16:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. --soum ^talk 14:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Your welcome! -- :) Chetblong 14:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

My name

I'll think about a new name, but I really like this on because it represents my initials and all the initials of my bestfriends. --Tdjzcsdrpf 17:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Congrats

Congrats on your 1000th edit. --soum ^talk 13:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! -- :) Chetblong 13:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Congrats as well. --wpktsfs 18:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again! -- :) Chetblong 18:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Heads up!

Wotcha this is a massive revert war between two editors, but I think you rv'd in some stuff that looks like vandalism. I know it was deleted but take a quick look at the massive 10RR war going on at that page.Pedro |  Chat  13:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for not noticing that. -- :) Chetblong 13:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

No probs - it's all good. The vandal account just got indef blocked. Pedro |  Chat  13:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Not account, accounts. I blocked four, netsnipe a couple more! Please report such incidents as early as possible. --soum ^talk 13:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Good. -- :) Chetblong 13:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Joseph Grieboski‎

Err, I don't think it counts as removal of speedy tags if the only contributor to the page is blanking the whole thing. If anything, it's sign that they're they're surrendering the fight. --Finngall ^talk 16:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page! Hut 8.5 16:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Your Welcome! -- :) Chetblong 16:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Speedy delete

No, the creator is not allowed to remove the speedy deletion tag. He can add a {{hangon}} tag and explain why it should not be deleted; others can join in the deletion as well. The decision whether to honor the speedy request is upto the admins.

As for blanking, s/he can blank it requesting the page be deleted (CSD G7). --soum ^talk 16:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. -- :) Chetblong 16:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

You earned it

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For the awesome effort you put into fighting vandalism. soum talk 09:20, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! -- :) Chetblong 13:22, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

A request

Hi, can you upload a Windows Vista screenshot for me? Of the search explorer (the one that opens when the Search button in the start menu is clicked). I am on not near my desktop (I am out of station currently, and I dont run Vista on it; Vista is installed only on my desktop). Could you please upload that. If it is not too much of a problem, please use Window Clippings. Thanks in advance. --soum ^talk 17:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Dont bother, it has been sorted out. --soum ^talk 13:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

I was sick with the flu and I wasn't on the computer. I just got on and saw your request, sorry I wasn't able to help. -- :) Chetblong 13:21, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Even I am down with fever. Hope you are fine now. :) --soum ^talk 14:18, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm better now and I am back at Wikipedia. Thanks for your thoughts. -- :) Chetblong 14:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Mosaic2007

Thanks for fixing Mosaic2007's error. I've been in touch with this new editor, and I will walk through the edit history with Mosaic2007 to explain what's happened. It was inadvertent, and I'll do my best to explain the way wiki's work so that it doesn't happen again. 68.89.149.2 22:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

My Pleasure. ^_^

Thank you for returning the favor. :) -WarthogDemon 02:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Your welcome! :) Chetblong 02:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. :) Chetblong 02:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Chetblong! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Daniel 08:57, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

How was my edit "not constructive"??

I edited the Atomic Rooster page and changed the name of the first album (which was wrong and is now wrong again thanks to your correction) and made both it and their s/t 1980 album hotlinks. Exactly what part of correcting an error on a page is "not constructive"?? Prezuiwf 17:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

You spelled Rooster Roooster. Thats called making an error. -- :) Chetblong 17:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

It would be if it weren't for the fact that that's THE NAME OF THEIR FIRST ALBUM. http://blog.diskunion.net/user/archangel_takekawa/kami/image/271.jpg How many "o"s do you count there?? Try checking your facts next time before you accuse someone of vandalism. Prezuiwf 17:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Excuse me for my error. When we revert vandalism we don't usually "check our facts", we look at the edit summary which you didn't write. -- :) Chetblong 18:00, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Excused. Prezuiwf 18:04, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Your wrong it's spelled Rooster with 2 "o"s go here. [1] -- :) Chetblong 18:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your exceedingly incorrect analysis but as you may have noticed that wasn't the album in question. The band's name is Rooster with 2 "o"s. The first album's name is Roooster with 3 "o"s (ergo, not self-titled). Subsequent albums, such as the one you erroneously cited and their self-titled 1980 effort, use the traditional band spelling. Prezuiwf 18:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry. -- :) Chetblong 18:23, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

KAFE-FM

Hi, I was trying to delete the page for KAFE-FM and then move KAFE to become KAFE-FM. I made the same edits to KISM and KGMI pages by changing them to KISM-FM and KGMI-AM. Reson being they are radio stations and should be filed under their full FCC details. Thanks Doublearon1 18:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Are you User:202.49.173.99? -- :) Chetblong 18:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

That IP address was used for that entry, and other items edited today by myself yes. It is a shared network. Other edits before todays date were not made by me. Doublearon1 18:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Okay. Since you're the creator of the article, I wouldn't have reverted your edits if you had been logged in. I'll undo my edit and you can continue to edit the page to your liking. -- :) Chetblong 18:21, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, I thought I was logged in. Guess it must of taken me out. If you can help out in changing KAFE to KAFE-FM that would be great. It won't let me do it. Thanks. Doublearon1 18:22, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry I haven't gotten on in a while. I've been real busy.--WalkerDragon 22:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

That's OK we don't expect you to come on Wikipedia every day. -- :) Chetblong 15:32, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry chetblong I had fallen asleep trying to make a new article for my new comic of the same name and hit backspace by mistake.--JakeTheImpaler

I believe you, so I removed the warning from your talk page. -- :) Chetblong 20:41, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry man

Hey, just wanted to apologize for being rude to you yesterday-- I was upset that my edit got deleted (among other things that happened to be going on that day) and I shouldn't have had an attitude about it. I realize you're just doing your job and, while it was an erroneous revert, I should have made an edit summary (which I will do next time). Anyway, sorry again for the attitude, I'll try not to let that happen again. Prezuiwf 20:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for apologizing, apology accepted. -- :) Chetblong 20:35, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

please indulge me

please do, tell me exactly how i vandalized the wonderbra article? that would be greatly appreciated~ 75.75.116.254 21:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Excuse me for that error, I looked into it and found out it wasn't you, it was someone at the IP address:129.2.100.201 who edited a template that I won't mention per WP:BEANS and did it in such a way (that I won't mention per WP:BEANS) that those pictures appeared. I was in such a rush to get those off I didn't realize it wasn't you who made the edit, sorry about that. -- :) Chetblong 21:39, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thank you for clearing that up. Now can you please remove the warning that you gave me? Thanks in advance 75.75.116.254 23:03, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

I've removed the error. -- :) Chetblong 00:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)