User talk:Cheapestcostavoider

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Ahem.

Though I appreciate your efforts to impose your personal taste in encyclopedias on everyone else on the internet, you really should attempt to figure out what Aetolia, the Midnight Age actually is before you go editing my entries. Perhaps a little experience would have shown you that the information was indeed valid. Anfini 22:11, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

The article you wrote started with, "Varian, the Celestine is the origin of all Creation. All that is, was, and will be is thanks only to His Divine Will." I think that's pretty clearly not encyclopedic content. --Cheapestcostavoider 05:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Like I said, you'd have to play the game. Ever play video games? Anfini 23:29, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hi.

Please read WP:NPA for everybody's sake. SushiGeek 22:39, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

As a neutral obsever, can I just say that [1] is uncalled for. If you engage in opersonal attacks, you may be blocked from editing wikipedia. Please read WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. --Doc ask? 22:51, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
I removed the second comment, but stand by the initial criticism of your administration style. Not only did you manufacture a vote count out of nowhere despite the fact that votes are irrelevant, but then reversed the decision after the debate had been closed. This is irresponsible and you provided no justification or reasoning.Cheapestcostavoider 00:46, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New Top fourteen page

I like the fact that your new t14 page has some non message board cites. I think I'll be able to support this page now should it face another AFD debate -- my concern before was the lack of specific support for this term outside the message board community; it just struck me as a neologism if only used there. Keep up the good work. Interestingstuffadder 03:44, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anna Ivey

Good job finding another source. A few more liem that and I might be ready to change my vote on the AFD. However, I still disagree with the idea of a speedy keep. As I've said, I believe in process and it seems worthwhile to let the debate run its course so all interested parties can have their say. What is there to lose from letting this debate run its course? Interestingstuffadder 16:24, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marduk in popular culture

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 01:53, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] T14

Very well; I will restore the latest version for now. Snottygobble 05:45, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

I have restored the latest version and taken it back to AFD. Snottygobble 05:54, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Law!

Thanks for adding your name to this project - we're working to make Wikipedia the world's most complete source of legal information! Cheers! BD2412 T 21:22, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Accounts

Cheapestcostavoider, may I ask if you are also User:Interestingstuffadder and/or User:Sparklemotion?

I note the structural similarity of the usernames "Cheapestcostavoider" and "Interestingstuffadder", and that the user page of Interestingstuffadder states "I openly admit that this is not my primary user account".

I also note that Sparklemotion has edited only four pages, all AFDs with which one or both of these other accounts has been involved. The following table summarises edits of the three accounts to pages in Sparklemotion's contributions history.

Anna Ivey AFD Twins-Yankees rivalry AFD The Diarrhea Song AFD Top Fourteen 1st AFD 2nd AFD
Interestingstuffadder edited nominated
withdrew nom		 keep keep edited nominated
Cheapestcostavoider edited keep keep keep edited keep
Sparklemotion keep keep keep keep

I see there are a number of AFDs where more than one of these accounts has voted. If more than one of these accounts are you, that would be a very serious breach of Wikipedia's policy on sockpuppetry.

Snottygobble 00:46, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User conduct RfC on Brian G. Crawford

Thought you might be interested in this:Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Brian_G._Crawford. -- backburner001 17:06, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blanking from about a month ago

What was up with [2]? SushiGeek 23:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

I don't know what happened with that. I was trying to delete my comment at line 243 but a bunch of other ones were also removed for some reason. Sorry about that. --Cheapestcostavoider 01:24, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Portal:Law selections

Greetings, fellow WikiProject Law member! One of our tasks on this WikiProject is the upkeep of Portal:Law, where we have set up a four week cycle wherein each week one of four key features - the selected article, biography, case, or image - is rotated out. Previous selections can be found at Portal:Law/former selections. Please contribute your thoughts at Portal talk:Law as to likely candidates for future rotations in each of these categories. Cheers! BD2412 T 04:59, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spam in Vault (company)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Vault (company), by Gwynand, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Vault (company) is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Vault (company), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Vault (company) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)