Talk:Chepstow Railway Bridge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
See also: WikiProject Trains to do list |
||||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) | ||||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject. | ||||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Railways.
|
 |
Chepstow Railway Bridge was a good article, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Delisted version: February 18, 2007 |
 |
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. | |
Some assistance with formatting would be welcome. Peter Maggs
I'm having trouble with dashes - as has the previous edit. Help anyone? Peter Maggs
Contents |
[edit] GA Re-Review and In-line citations
Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. LuciferMorgan 00:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Good Article Review
This article is currently under Good Article Review. LuciferMorgan 21:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Removed
Review the comments leading to this consensus here. Article may be re-submitted in the future once the issues left by reviewers are sorted. Nja247 (talk • contribs) 13:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Improving the flow
I think the article has a lot of useful detail, but maybe it needs to have the logical flow imrpoved. I think it needs to start with something like geography, timeline, site difficulty, technical solution, why adopted, shortcomings, subsequent developments elsewhere.
I think some of the detail, e.g. the boys who set fire to Conw(a)y bridge, while true, detract from the authority of this page.
I'm not sure that there are many other references that can be cited, but it needs to be attempted. If no-one has any adverse comments, I'll have a shot at this shortly
Afterbrunel 20:24, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Haven't looked at the whole flow, sorry, but you could easily lose the 2nd para of the 'epilogue'. (Just check that the details are also contained in the appropriate articles...) As for references, I'm sure there are more around. I've been working on Wharncliffe Viaduct (also Brunel) and I've been surprised how many refs we could find.
- EdJogg 23:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
