Talk:Chemical weapons in the Rif War

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article has had a peer review which is now archived. Associated task forces (general topics): Military technology and engineering task force Weaponry task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): African military history task force Spanish military history task force

	Morocco Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Morocco, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Morocco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	Spain Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Has Spain ever made a formally denied using the chemical weapons?

All we have is the bill of aknowledgment which was rejected at the Spanish parliament by both main political parties. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 10:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Article Cleanup

I don't know anything about the facts of the situation, but the article is awfully clunky. I get the feeling the original author's English isn't very strong, but he made a valiant effort nonetheless. I'll clean it up without removing any statements.--The Centipede 20:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Having gone through it, it's a shame I don't know more about it. The article seems (perhaps overly?) well-documented, but centers more around proving itself and the event rather than describing the event in an encyclopaedic fashion. Does anyone else know anything about this? --The Centipede 20:51, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

I researched the subject in depth and i believe there is no further bibliography that you'd find apart from the ones used as references. I tried to compile all those references and present them according to their contexts (lack of sources, cover-up, facts based on Spanish sources, new facts, etc...) Please have a look at its archived peer review. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 10:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)