Talk:Chembai

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chembai has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (see comments)
	This article is maintained by the Kerala workgroup.
More information about this article... Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale by the India project.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
More information about this article... The following comments have been left for this page: Extensive article, but tone still slightly lacking, and references from very limited sources. Cain Mosni 03:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC) (edit)

Chembai was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: December 14, 2006

Archives

1 2

[edit] Peer Review comments

Hi, please list down suggestions here to help this article meet FAC. -- ॐ Kris (☎ talk | contribs) 19:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Article shows a fully partiality A4ay 07:32, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps you've got to read your own user talk page once in a while, or explain properly with examples as to what you mean by "partiality". Thanks & regards ­ ॐ Kris (☎ talk | contribs) 09:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA review

Informationally speaking, this has a lot of promise. There are a number of issues that need to be dealt with before this can be considered.

1. The references need to be cited better. See WP:CITE for pointers.

   Along with this, consider some non-web references. They may be hard to come by given the language gap, but his importance would probably suggest some possible better references.

2. It's very listy. Consider working the paragraph breaks for performances and appearances into a more prose-based standard. The way it breaks up is jarring when read.
3. Consider moving the recordings to their own separate pages. The article is detailed enough where it doesn't need to be here, plenty can be said to sustain individual articles, and that's the basic standard anyway.
4. Fair use images need rationales, and if you're planning to eventually bring this to FA, you may need some more detail regarding the GFDL licensing, but I'm not sure about that.

Good luck! --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

ALSO The article has some WP:NPOV problems as well. I'm afraid it comes across as hero worship of Chembai.--Ling.Nut 02:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism by user:venu62

See this original reversion by venu62 without specifying any rhyme or reason.

I undid that and he repeatedly reverts the page which proves his vandalism. He says I created this article so I cant revert his vandalism, which is plain cock and bull story. ­ Kris (talk) 15:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

See these discussions regarding this matter. This editor has a history of promoting his websites on wikipedia. WP:NPA guidelines tell us that calling a valid edit vandalism is a personal attack. Parthi ^{talk/contribs} 19:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)