User talk:Charivari
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Charivari, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Djegan 20:21, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Women in Art
Nice job adding the Pre-Raphaelite artist section. - AKeen 19:49, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Good points
Hello Charivari. Thanks for the pointers; you're quite right, I did a bog-standard job of it! Sorry! Will read the necessary guidelines. Thanks for setting my mistakes right. Hope to hear more from you again, Fergananim 11:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Savoyard pages
Dear Charivari, You are correct that one should not copy from a copyrighted source and merely republish on the web without permission. However, the Savoyard descriptions will not violate copyright for two reasons. First, I have permission from the authors of the Who's Who pages that I have used, who are personally known to me. Secondly, the Savoyard pages are a collaboration between myself, Marc Shepherd and others. Here is our proceure. First, I get some biographical material from the who's who pages and other sources (The G&S Companion, etc.) and edit it down to a more encyclopedic format. Then Marc pulls out various biographies and other secondary sources and adds more citations and material to round out the research. Finally, other editors can look over the pages and add/edit. So, if you give the new entries a couple of days, I think you will find that they are not dependent on any one source. Fair enough? (A good example might be the Martyn Green page.) Ssilvers 12:36, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Gala Dalí
Hi Charivary, I wonder why you think category "Russian models" is inappropriate ? Gala was born Elena Ivanovna Diakonova in Russia and posed as a model for Dali. Sure she was more then a model for Dali but she was both Russian and a model. Am I wrong ? Thanks Abune
[edit] Reply
Hi I missed the out of date link, but the double ArtMagick link is a personal site, it's not academic, or verifiable. I won't delete it and if you feel really strongly that this particular personal site does add something, then leave it as an external link. StopItTidyUp 11:12, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Morris Dance link deletion
The user had few contributions and was adding external links to multiple articles. it is a behaviour pattern that tends to worry me.Geni 11:26, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Spam blacklist
Well, try to add that link back and you'll see how m:spam blacklist works. When a link contained in the an article gets blacklisted, the article becomes uneditable until the link is removed. Conscious 09:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hello
Regarding the article Ash, Surrey - you have edited, have you got any green idea about the origin of the name Ash?
Eliko 00:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tilusha Ghelani article
Hello. While I can see that you do a lot of good wiki-work, I question the relevance of some details within your article on Tilusha Ghelani. The Lorca, for example, was not a professional production and has little connection with her reason for notability - her work as a radio producer. Very few Biographical articles warrant a description of a subject's A Level studies. While you have been thorough in your internet searches on Ms Ghelani and in your source-notation, not all sources are acceptable in terms of verifiability and the Biography of Living Persons Guidelines. Comprehensiveness does not necessarily aid comprehension.
I thought it polite to raise the issue with you, so that you can edit it yourself should you wish to.
Cheers. Ned-kogar 01:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Woman on the Edge of Time (book cover).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Woman on the Edge of Time (book cover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC)