User talk:Chancat74

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Monica Abbott 1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Monica Abbott 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Genisock2 13:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Genisock, I took the picture myself. I'm somewhat new at this, so I don't know how to accomplish what you're asking. I went through the licensing menu and thought I did what was needed to verify the file.

Okey thankyou. The photo appears to be taken of a big screen and these things tend to be kinda problematical copyright wise.Genisock2 18:51, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Bell Performance

Bell Performance, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Bell Performance satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bell Performance and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Bell Performance during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sasha Callahan 06:35, 29 September 2007 (UTC)