User talk:CHawke

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Came here from another place which has lost its way.

Will stay and see what I can do.

Contents

[edit] List_of_war_heroes

Hi. You listed List_of_war_heroes at 3RR. But... (a) it was 3 not 4 (b) there is no discussion on the talk page at all. William M. Connolley 16:05, 2 February 2006 (UTC).

Sorry, my mistake over the rules, 1st time I have "been bold" and listed something for deletion - have I done things in the wrong way - (apart from not adding anything to the discussion page - now done)? Assuming he had done 4 reverts, was what I did OK? (sorry also for not reading your box on your page and initially posting there. --C Hawke 16:16, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Had it been 4, you would have been correct. Read WP:3RR perhaps. Also a good idea to drop him a note on his talk page: maybe there is a good reason for what he is doing; always worth while trying to ask. William M. Connolley 16:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC).

[edit] User:Swedenman

Hi there! I just wanted you to know that user:Swedenman is identical with Filipman on Swedish Wikipedia. This user has been involved in several edit wars. He has been editing unreflectingly. In addition to this he has abused other wikipedians. Filipman, who claims to be 14 (!) years old, has been banned 6 times [1]. Probert 16:32, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Who and Deep Purple

Can you lodge an official complaint against this SOB who keeps adding horribly referenced claims of 100 million albums sold to The Who's and Deep Purple's pages? I don't know how to do that. This jerk has even put warnings on MY talk page about banning ME for deleting his garbage. Thanks for helping me keep these pages encyclopedia worthy. 74.77.222.188 (talk) 07:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, yeah, he also put this bullshit on my page about me being a sockpuppet of YOU. Register a complaint about that, too, if you can. 74.77.222.188 (talk) 07:05, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


Alas I don't really know how to follow this up, unless the user breaks the 3 revert rule. THere is a similar edit war on Pink Floyd and looking at some other pages similar across the site.--C Hawke (talk) 07:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
The Pink Floyd one has flared up again? Wonderful. Back to work. 74.77.222.188 (talk) 05:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)



{{helpme}}

See above, this refers to an edit war over credible references on the Deep Purple entry - most of those writing in the discussion agree that the references quoted do not meet WP:RS but these keep getting reverted, and now I am being accused of vanalism - it appears that those keen on the poor quality references are not prepared to discuss their point on the relevant page.--C Hawke (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Help Me

I recommend that you take the issue to Request for Comment Or you can ask an Administrator. Happy Editing, Dustitalk 18:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I've addded it to Reliable_sources/Noticeboard as that seems the best place as it is the reliability of the sources that is in debate - if that fails I'll ask an admin - what is the current policy on removing the vandalism tag on my page? I know in the past it wasn't approved of to remove it yourself?--C Hawke (talk) 19:03, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
I tnull'ed the helpme template above, it seems you have appropriate help on this issue. Also, see WP:BLANKING about the removal of warnings. If you need anything else, don't hesitate to let me know. --omtay38 19:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)