User:CharlesGillingham/Drafts/Lead for History of Science

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Science is a body of empirical, theoretical, and practical knowledge about the natural world, produced by a global community of researchers. The history of mathematics, history of technology, and history of philosophy are distinct areas of research and are covered in other articles.

For most historians, the use of technology or the study of nature in any culture is a form of science.[1] Some have argued there is a body of techniques (called the scientific method) that distinguishes the scientifc from the pre-scientific. Elements of this method are usually considered include rationality, naturalism, empiricism, observation, experiment, and skepticism. These methods have been used, separately or together, in many different civilizations and many different times.[2] Others argue science must be defined differently, in terms of the existence of lasting institutions or social roles for science.[3] A few deny that science can be defined at all.[4]

[edit] The Birth of Science

There is no single time and place, no civilization or historical period that all historians agree is the "birth of science." Each of these moments have been considered, by one historian or another, as the "true" birth of science.

[edit] Early cultures

Mesopotamian clay tablet, 492 BC; writing allowed the recording of astronomical information.
Mesopotamian clay tablet, 492 BC; writing allowed the recording of astronomical information.
See also: Alchemy

In prehistoric times, advice and knowledge was passed from generation to generation in an oral tradition. The development of writing enabled knowledge to be stored and communicated across generations with much greater fidelity. Combined with the development of agriculture, which allowed for a surplus of food, it became possible for early civilizations to develop, because more time could be devoted to tasks other than survival.

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Most histories of science, here.
  2. ^ Sagan, Cromer, other guys who claim there is a scientific method
  3. ^ Merton, etc
  4. ^ Feyerabend, for example.
  5. ^ Robin Dunbar argues that science began in Paleolithic times in What's her book called?
  6. ^ Joseph Needham's= Science and Technology in China. Other histories that begin in prehistory: W. C. Dampier Wetham, Science, in Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed. (New York: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc, 1911);D. Pingree, Hellenophilia versus the History of Science, Isis 83, 559 (1982); Pat Munday, entry "History of Science," New Dictionary of the History of Ideas (Charles Scribner's Sons, 2005).
  7. ^ Alan Cromer gives credit to the Greeks in Uncommon Knowledge: The Heretial Nature of Science" and Carl Sagan in Cosmos considers these the first true scientists. I'm guesing that M. Clagett, Greek Science in Antiquity (New York: Collier Books, 1955) belongs on this list too.
  8. ^ The achievements of Islamic science are detailed in Toby Huff, 2006, Early Modern Science Cambridge University Press
  9. ^ The importance of institutions that are (1) lasting (2) independent of secular or religious authority is emphasized by Huff in The Rise of Early Modern Science, Cambridge University Press.
  10. ^ The invention of an ethos of science in 1600s is emphasized Merton
  11. ^ WHO LIKES THE SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION? Not Kuhn or Shapiro
  12. ^ Kuhn's note about the connection between empirical and theoretical science not being made until the 19th cent, ANY ONE ELSE? Joseph Ben-David, maybe