Talk:Charlotte Ross

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles related to Chicago.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
WikiProject Illinois This article is part of WikiProject Illinois, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Nude image

Whats wrong w this image?

Image:Charlotterossnypdblue.jpg
Charlotte Ross nude in an episode of NYPD Blue.

(Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 21:14, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Nothing, if you want to whack off to it. It's just not encyclopedic or professional for an article on her. Mike H 21:19, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
There's not enough nudity. AngryParsley 21:20, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Have you seen woman? Or auto fellatio, or clitoris, or whatever? I think the image is a good one, and I see no reason nto to use it. (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 21:28, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Charlotte Ross is not known for her nudity. There's no reason for it to be in her article. Mike H 21:29, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)

I disagree with you on both counts. For one thing I know absolutely nothing about her other than that she was naked on NYPD blue. For another, this sort of thing ads alot to what is otherwise a fairly uninteresting article. (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 21:33, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

She was a regular cast member on the show, not one who just came on for T&A. She was also on Days of Our Lives for four years, things you would have known if you took the five seconds needed to read the article. Mike H 21:35, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)

Well of course I did that (I kinda had to, since I edited it a couple of times), I was over simplifying for the sake of politeness I suppose. Maybe I should have said "I never cared about about Charlotte Ross much, the only memorable aspect about her for me was that she was naked on television", but I thought that might have been discourteous. Anyhow, her nudity is fairly significant IMO, how many people have been nude on a major broadcast television network in the US? And @ Angry Parsley, what do you mean "whats up w Sam Spade all of a sudden"? (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 21:57, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Almost every cast member of NYPD Blue has been nude at one time or another. The nudity thing isn't that shocking anymore, especially when it happened to her (2003). Mike H 22:03, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)

I didn't mean to suggest it shocked me, only that the transition from nudity being verboten (it wasn't illegal, but there was an understanding between the stations and the advertisers) and the normal relationship with nudity found in europe is a signifigant one, worthy of documentation. Ms. Ross was part of that process, and is noteworthy as such. (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 08:50, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

She's just as noteworthy as Dennis Franz. Why don't we put his ass up on Wikipedia? Mike H 08:51, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)

Feel free, I don't happen to have free image of his arse, nor an interest in procuring one. I surely won't vote to delete it if you find one tho ;) (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 09:40, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)